Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ml1954
This is the kind of evolution evolutionists should be passionate about.
Care to translate/interpret this? Was the writer disputing the TOE when he wrote it? I couldn't find anything disputing the TEO in it, so what point were you were trying to make?

I don't understand your question, but my point in making the statement "This is the kind of evolution evolutionists should be passionate about" was that they most evo's seem to be against the notion that God created man and are more intent on finding a naturalistic explanation.

318 posted on 07/22/2006 5:59:44 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: DouglasKC

I don't understand your question,

Okay. I thought I should have been easily understood. I didn't see how your posting of srcipture supported your assertion that "This is the kind of evolution evolutionists should be passionate about." I didn't see anything about evolution in the scripture you posted.

but my point in making the statement...was that most evo's seem to be against the notion that God created man

I don't think this is true. I think your impression is mistaken.

and are more intent on finding a naturalistic explanation.

The Theory of Evolution does not say that God didn't create man.

321 posted on 07/22/2006 6:18:07 PM PDT by ml1954 (NOT the BANNED disruptive troll who was seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson