Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ToryHeartland

>>>Some transitional fossils [link to Wikipedia]<<<

You use Wikipedia for a reference, and you expect me to take you seriously? Seriously, "scientist", there should be countless transitional fossils and living 'creatures' identified by now, to the point there could be no ambiguity.


197 posted on 07/22/2006 12:53:07 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: PhilipFreneau
you expect me to take you seriously?

I have no such expectation. Anyone in such profound denial about the last 150 years of biological science, who believes such a vast body of consistent data can be hand-waved away, is not really a good candidate to listen to anything that I might have to say.

Do, however, please note that my previous post offered the list from Wikipedia as "a very basic place to start." If you have a subscription to Nature, there are rather more scholarly offerings on the topic. I don't see why you see the convenience of a starting list invalid; but we could certainly look at each item on the list in more scholarly format.

Shall we start at the top, with Tiktaalik? University of Chicago is the logical place to start, here.

205 posted on 07/22/2006 1:15:26 PM PDT by ToryHeartland (English Football -- no discernable planning whatsoever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson