I have no such expectation. Anyone in such profound denial about the last 150 years of biological science, who believes such a vast body of consistent data can be hand-waved away, is not really a good candidate to listen to anything that I might have to say.
Do, however, please note that my previous post offered the list from Wikipedia as "a very basic place to start." If you have a subscription to Nature, there are rather more scholarly offerings on the topic. I don't see why you see the convenience of a starting list invalid; but we could certainly look at each item on the list in more scholarly format.
Shall we start at the top, with Tiktaalik? University of Chicago is the logical place to start, here.
>>>Anyone in such profound denial about the last 150 years of biological science, who believes such a vast body of consistent data can be hand-waved away, is not really a good candidate to listen to anything that I might have to say.<<<
No offense, Tory, but your idea of a "vast body of consistent data" is laughable, to be kind. Of course, every scientist who disagrees with the myth of Evolution is "out of the mainstream", much like those who challenge the so-called "global warming is caused by people" myth.