To: Al Simmons
The T Rex birth rate is too low to support Evolutionary arguments of random mutations occuring fast enough to bring about species change.
7 posted on
07/03/2006 12:38:51 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
"The T Rex birth rate is too low to support Evolutionary arguments of random mutations occuring fast enough to bring about species change."
How's that?
To: Southack
The T Rex birth rate is too low to support Evolutionary arguments of random mutations occuring fast enough to bring about species change. If you take the reproductive rate of alligators or Komodo dragons as a ballpark estimate, how many generations do you think would occur in, say, 30 million years? How many generations do you suppose it takes to get a teacup poodle from a line of wolves, or from a pack of mongrel dogs?
30 posted on
07/03/2006 12:55:32 PM PDT by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: Southack
The T Rex birth rate is too low to support Evolutionary arguments of random mutations occuring fast enough to bring about species change. Shhh!! Don't be putting facts contrary to the darwininan fundies orthodoxy on theses threads...orionblamblam will have a hissy.
45 posted on
07/03/2006 1:17:06 PM PDT by
Mogollon
To: Southack
>>The T Rex birth rate is too low to support Evolutionary arguments of random mutations occuring fast enough to bring about species change.<<
Spoilsport! :)
60 posted on
07/03/2006 1:37:45 PM PDT by
RobRoy
(The Internet is about to do to Evolution what it did to Dan Rather. Information is power.)
To: Southack
The reason T. Rex had such a low birth rate is that T. Rex women all went into the workplace.
Making T. Rex homes became a low priority.
117 posted on
07/03/2006 2:55:24 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999 !!!)
To: Southack
> The T Rex birth rate is too low to support Evolutionary arguments...
Indeed so. Because T-Rex has been extinct for 65 million years. Their birth rate is *ZERO* per year.
208 posted on
07/03/2006 5:05:36 PM PDT by
orionblamblam
(I'm interested in science and preventing its corruption, so here I am.)
To: Southack
The T Rex birth rate is too low to support Evolutionary arguments of random mutations occuring fast enough to bring about species change. Interesting. Can you provide a link? Thanks!
214 posted on
07/03/2006 5:11:08 PM PDT by
OmahaFields
("What have been its fruits? ... superstition, bigotry and persecution.")
To: Southack
The T Rex birth rate is too low to support Evolutionary arguments of random mutations occuring fast enough to bring about species change.
Sorry is someone has already asked this... But, what species has someone claimed T Rex evolved into that you are disputing could not have occurred?
217 posted on
07/03/2006 5:14:01 PM PDT by
ml1954
(NOT the BANNED disruptive troll who was seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
To: Southack
The T Rex birth rate is too low to support Evolutionary arguments of random mutations occuring fast enough to bring about species change. Please post the actual calculations or a link.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson