To: js1138
"All possible changes are explored in 15 cases (3*5, not 3^5). Evolution "looks" for the small change that will confer a reproductive advantage."
How did your bacteria experiment obtain 20 million unique DNA sequences using your above 3*N math (and an "N" of 1953)?
651 posted on
07/10/2006 12:04:12 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
I didn't say multiple site changes can't occur. I said evolution doesn't typically require multiple simultaneous changes.
Your mathematical model is based on shuffling the entire deck for each generation. Evolution accumulates small changes. Each viable generation will have few changes from the previous.
It does not require astronomical odds to explore all possible changes, one at a time.
653 posted on
07/10/2006 12:12:21 PM PDT by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: Southack
Your calculation, 3
1953, produces a number of full genome changes, and a number of 1952 point changes, and a number of 1951 point changes, and so on...
Those larger mutations aren't likely to happen.
665 posted on
07/10/2006 3:07:52 PM PDT by
b_sharp
(Why bother with a tagline? Even they eventually wear out!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson