To: Southack
The source of variation does not matter. In the example I gave, based on observation of living things rather than a computer model, every possible variation occurred, and the ones that improved viability were selected.
579 posted on
07/06/2006 8:54:13 PM PDT by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: js1138
"In the example I gave, based on observation of living things rather than a computer model, every possible variation occurred, and the ones that improved viability were selected."
I'm afraid that you'll have to show a reputable link for that sort of wild-eyed claim to be taken seriously.
580 posted on
07/06/2006 8:58:15 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: js1138
"The source of variation does not matter."
Incorrect. The source of the sequencing is the entire debate!
If the data sequencing is random, then Evolutionary Theory wins.
If the data sequencing is biased, then Intellgient Design wins.
581 posted on
07/06/2006 9:00:24 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson