Ironically, your example of casino math only conveys a single trend (i.e. the house eventually wins), failing to yield enough properly sequenced data to code a life form (e.g. red casino chips being DNA A, green casino chips being DNA G, black casino chips being DNA T, blue casino chips being DNA C) or otherwise convey any meaningful amount of information.
In fact, the sum of all casinos playing colored chips over all of history will not, statistically, properly sequence (by chance) the DNA of even the most simple life form.
Not even once.
But your example of math conveys absolutely nothing. It models nothing, ant is and example of nothing. It is completely irrelevant because it isn't in any way related to the way evolution works.
You have yet to tell us where you got your information about the breeding habits of T-Rex.