To: Southack
"T Rex did breed too slowly for random mutations to account for the changes in said beast. That's my opinion."
And this is based on? Nothing.
"Alligators do breed slowly, once per year, yet are prolific (20 to 50 young at a time) and virtually unchanged over millions of years."
Except for all the speciation and higher level branching.
"Remaining unchanged over vast amounts of time is contradictory to vast amounts of random mutations."
No it isn't. You are yet again forgetting about selection.
"Of course, you have a problem with every word above. You have to. You have to be argumentative, as your belief-structure is threatened by such easily laid out points."
LOL Not even you believe what you just wrote.
Keep flailing. I have stopped expecting you to back anything you said up, or for you to be big enough to admit you screwed up. That would take a level of integrity (minuscule) you lack.
To: CarolinaGuitarman
Remaining unchanged over vast amounts of time is contradictory to vast amounts of random mutations.
"No it isn't. You are yet again forgetting about selection."

Incorrect. Selection isn't in question. It isn't forgotten; it simply isn't controversial.
Instead, you are unaware of the mathematical probabilities of "randomness."
Remaining unchanged over vast amounts of time is contradictory to vast amounts of random mutations.
284 posted on
07/03/2006 8:15:43 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: CarolinaGuitarman
Knock it off!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson