[Southack]

That's incorrect. The alligator is little-changed in 200 million years.

"That doesn't make them devoid of [random] mutations. You said they were, which is wildly incorrect."

On the contrary, a little-changed species represents an insignificant number of random mutations over 200 million years.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"On the contrary, a little-changed species represents an insignificant number of random mutations over 200 million years."

They aren't even the same species as those living two million years ago. *Alligator* is not a species designation.

Again, it has not gone unnoticed you are still avoiding the fact you claimed that alligators bred slowly, and alleged this supported your claim that T-rex bred even slower. Since it was pointed out you made an error, you have changed the topic to alligators instead of the T-rex. Your flailing about hasn't fooled anybody.

[js1138]

On the contrary, a little-changed species represents an insignificant number of random mutations over 200 million years.

You have a citation for this? Evidence? Studies of mutation rates in alligators?