No, but I don't see the answer given, when you say you want "unborn" to have the same rights as the "born". The born are exposed to smoke and sometimes to drinking mothers. Your okaying of limiting a woman's right to do that - even if you don't like the quality of their decision - means you're at the same level of hyperbole, as far as I'm concerned.
A born child doesn't digest alcohol the same as an unborn when the mother drinks.
Why isn't a pregnant woman charged with abuse when she births a baby with fetal alcohol syndrome?