I just heard some people interviewed in Durham on this case on the Radio.
Looks like they are focusing on the CIVIL case. Victoria Petersen was on the Radio and she said she's talked to lawyers in Durham and she's talked to the AV Family.
She said that the one of the people on the lease of the house was EVANS, she intimated that Evan's parents name was on the lease. She said that a 22 year old old invited the strippers and served alcohol to underage men in this same house. Mrs. Petersen said that the Evan's Mother - a lobbyist in Washington is going to be held financially responsible for the events that happened in that house that night. She mentioned the lower standard in the Civil court and she said the Washington Lawyer Father (that she connected to George Bush's White House) will have to pay for the actions of his son.
Again, she claimed to have spoken with many lawyers and were assured that the AV has a super strong case in civil court. Then she mentioned Duke's liability. She said Duke owned the house and had protected the unlawful players and looked the other way for years, allowing this to happen.
She said Duke would be a defendant in the Civil lawsuit also.
So, you can see where this case is going. The AV, and the black lawyers in her entourage are looking to get super Rich from this case. The Race angle will be used to exploit the jury and move the damages into the ionosphere.
Noticeably absent was the discussion of the CRIMINAL case: by the Durham women speaking.
That's the only place where we were lucky. Our son was charged as an adult, though still in high school. When the AV called to start negotiations, she was told that she would have to get blood from a turnip. My heart is bleeding for the Evanses. Sweet, Jesus, they have to stay the course and counter-sue.
One sure way to continue the downward spiral of negative publicity for Durham is for the false accuser and her family to receive a windfall via her lies, enabled by a Durham jury of her peers - people of low character.
What a surprise!
Sure, they're looking to the civil case to exonerate a black woman from obviously filing false charges and fatten their own coffers in the process. That's why Reade Seligmann should sue Mangum.
I think Tory Peterson, probably the biggest big mouth in Durham, is in for a rough ride if she thinks this is going to be a cakewalk: "She said Duke owned the house and had protected the unlawful players and looked the other way for years, allowing this to happen." "This"? This WHAT to happen? Somebody needs to tell Tory all she has to stand on is her big mouth. What, if any, were the responses, either from the host or other callers, to her statements?