"The results, the lawyers said, show that investigators collected no genetic material of any kind from the woman. "There was no DNA found in or on her that would indicate that she recently had any sex," Cheshire said."
The quote I am trying to theorize about. N & O Aprill 11th.
I understand that is the quote you keep referring to. But we now know that is wrong per the link you provided. The question we have been discussing for almost a day now, is why was Cheshire wrong when he made that statement. So which are you opting for?
1. Did the defense not have all the information. ie Did Nifong not tell them of the DNA found on the swabs from Mangum?
2. Did the defense mispeak and say no DNA was found when they meant no DNA material that could be connected to Duke lacrosse players?