I understand that is the quote you keep referring to. But we now know that is wrong per the link you provided. The question we have been discussing for almost a day now, is why was Cheshire wrong when he made that statement. So which are you opting for?
1. Did the defense not have all the information. ie Did Nifong not tell them of the DNA found on the swabs from Mangum?
2. Did the defense mispeak and say no DNA was found when they meant no DNA material that could be connected to Duke lacrosse players?
I am only theorizing.
Assuming that Cheshire misspoke with those strong statements gives me nothing to theorize about.
It is hard for me to believe Cheshire simply made an error. In the video, he consults another attorney before making the statement about there being no indication CGM had sex.