Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H; JLS
if you were on the jury, would you believe that she was never asked that again?

I'm not sure why you are saying she wasn't asked again. The problem is the only reference to their descriptions was the officer's note asking a follow up question. The original description is what is missing.

District Attorney Mike Nifong gave defense lawyers nearly 1,300 pages of evidence last week, saying it was his complete case file. But lawyers for Collin Finnerty say those documents include only one reference to police asking the accuser for a description, in what appears to be an investigator's note.

"I asked her questions trying to follow up on a better description of the suspects, she was unable to remember anything further about the suspects," the note from Durham police investigator B.W. Himan says,

406 posted on 05/26/2006 5:41:28 AM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]


To: Krodg

I probably misunderstood what Tucker was saying last night. It appears she indeed did give a description, which is what the defense wants to know. It is possible she wasn't asked again until the lineup, but I don't think we know that.


418 posted on 05/26/2006 7:06:17 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson