Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6

The recently released DNA tests showed a match between the "boyfriend" and DNA found on a vaginal swab which was part of the rape kit gathered at DMC. Don't you think that swab was tested by the SBI? I certainly do.

The problem was it wasn't until the boyfriend was swabbed on May 3 that there was a sample which matched the vaginal swab collected by the SANE.


248 posted on 05/25/2006 4:20:25 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]


To: GAgal

No, I think it's clear that the SBI found no genetic material of any kind on CGM. I have read the statments many times now and they are clear to me.

As far as I am concerned, the SBI found no DNA at all from anyone other than CGM, on or in CGM.


250 posted on 05/25/2006 4:29:41 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

To: GAgal

A sample that did not match the LAX players is exculpatory evidence. It would have been in the first report, imo.

What is the point of leaving it out, anyway? It will only look bad in court when it comes out that you left that out of the report.


252 posted on 05/25/2006 4:34:35 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson