[ltc8k6]

No, I think it's clear that the SBI found no genetic material of any kind on CGM. I have read the statments many times now and they are clear to me.

As far as I am concerned, the SBI found no DNA at all from anyone other than CGM, on or in CGM.

[GAgal]

Okay, but aren't you relying on the "statements" read by Cheshire from the SBI report provided to him concerning his client/s? Why would the SBI be required to tell him about evidence related to others found on the accuser?

[JLS]

No, I think it's clear that the SBI found no genetic material of any kind on CGM. I have read the statments many times now and they are clear to me.

Actually NO LAB found any DNA on her. When it comes to live people, labs only test sample that are presented to them. Thus either the SANE or examining MD could have found DNA on her.

I suspect the state lab initially found that the DNA in her excluded all lacrosse players and the DNA the lab found on the nail excluded all but two lacrosse players for him the results were inconclusive. [BTW, we have evidence it is a weak, ie a good bit worse than a 12 point consistency, inconclusive too.]

The private lab confirmed all of these results. They also matched the DNA from in her to someone. The state lab did not match the DNA from in her to this someone because it did not have a sample from the people she had sex with that night.

We know this for a number of reasons:

1. A defense attorney said that the DNA evidence on Evans, the inconclusive sample on the nails, was known at the time of the first indictments.

2. A defense attorney said the match with the "boyfriend" was all that the private lab added to the DNA results.

3. It is pretty clear that until discovery was due, Nifong held back the DNA from in her existed.

[NCjim]

I think it's clear that the SBI found no genetic material of any kind on CGM.

Close enough for government work...