Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gag order sought in lacrosse case (NAACP Wants Gag Order)
Durham Herald-Sun ^ | May 25, 2006 | PAUL BONNER

Posted on 05/25/2006 5:04:51 AM PDT by abb

DURHAM -- A lawyer with the state NAACP said the civil rights organization intends to seek a gag order in the Duke lacrosse case, and a journalist who participated in a forum with him on Wednesday said media coverage of the alleged rape may deprive the alleged victim of her legal rights to a fair trial.

Al McSurely, an attorney who chairs the Legal Redress Committee for the state National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, said he generally respects the defense attorneys in the case as colleagues. But they are violating the State Bar's rules of professional conduct that discourage comments outside court that are likely to prejudice a case, he said.

The NAACP will try to intervene in the case to file a "quiet zone/let's let justice work" motion. That is otherwise known as a gag order, he acknowledged, although he said he doesn't like that term.

McSurely's comments came amid the first-ever Durham Conference on the Moral Challenges of our Culture at First Presbyterian Church downtown. The session gave the approximately 150 people who attended a chance to hear a series of talks and discuss among themselves sexual and domestic violence, racism, class distinctions and the media.

(Excerpt) Read more at herald-sun.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: crystalgailmangum; duke; dukelax; durham; lacrosse; naacp; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 721-727 next last
To: SwampFoxSC

Pretty powerful stuff...I wish I could smugly say at least it's Durham.

It is not
It is Atlanta
It is my beloved Richmond.
It is everywhere.

This is what civil rights has given blacks.


521 posted on 05/26/2006 2:41:41 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

Yes, and that's why the N&O report is so stupid.

Amazing.


522 posted on 05/26/2006 2:42:19 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

No.

I know how the News Corpse works. They have access to many databases and in North Carolina most of the information is Public information.

Since the AV has a record and her "boyfriend" has a record, they are probably linked in a database somewhere. Police like to track known criminals and the people they associate with.

In this case, with the AV's family and their mouths, I think it would take nothing more than a fake press ID and a knock at the door (it would help to be black) or $30.00 to an uncle to get the boyfriends name and address.


523 posted on 05/26/2006 2:44:24 PM PDT by Mike Nifong (Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

Thanks, sometimes a bit of reality check helps regain focus. So much swimming between my ears.


524 posted on 05/26/2006 2:44:42 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

I am surprised it has not leaked yet. At least what type of person he is. What was the Quote? "Everybody knows him in the hood?"


525 posted on 05/26/2006 2:46:38 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

Apparently. The first one was the team pictures in their matching blue jerseys. Just guessing, the second one had the bare torso shots taken on Mar. 23 when the players went to the jail to give DNA.


526 posted on 05/26/2006 2:48:06 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: All; GAgal; Protect the Bill of Rights; Peach; Jezebelle

Great article GAgal! I thought one of two things.

Either she had continually - purposefully put off the ID for 3 weeks stalling for a small time lawyer or her boyfriend to get through an asset check OR

Nifong and investigators (and I use that term loosely) weren't happy with her previous efforts (with a lineup)

Nifong, Baker and their corrupt co-horts have crossed the line here. Imagine the procedures followed for that lineup : and this stuff was ALL supposed to be in discovery - meaning the peripheral information the defense is asking for.

Either Nifong goes after more people on the edge of the case like the Cabbie and gets deeper - he's desperate to find someone willing to testify to the rape (without regard to the acurrateness of the testimony), a weak link willing to cave. Either Nifong goes in that direction and becomes even more aggressive and outlandish OR he's taken off the case by the N.C. Governor or the Feds.

Most of the people here are good people, and they keep waiting for Nifong to throw in the towel or the AV to come clean - It's not going to happen. Nifong will not concede that he railroaded the players or that he doesn't have the goods, the AV isn't in a hurry to going back and turning tricks. The AV has opportunities like never before at this point.

This is a textbook case is abuse of power.

Thank you for the article


527 posted on 05/26/2006 2:57:45 PM PDT by Mike Nifong (Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
This is what civil rights has given blacks.

I disagree. Race did not cause this. This is what the feminazis have wrought with accusations of sexual abuse. Similar unbalancing of the scales of justice has also taken place when accused in child molestation cases are not allowed to confront their accuser.

Basically some percentage of the world are scam artists. The second some group argues that a woman or a child never lies about such charges, there is some woman or child out their ready to take advantage of such stupidity. The founders of the US and the evolution of trial proceedure over the years led to a pretty good if not perfect system. Some people don't like it that they can not go whoring around and not have a jury somewhat discount their claim of rape so they have tried to change the burden of proof in rape cases. They want to say silly things like that that started this thread, ie a compaintant has a right to a fair trial, rather than the accused.
528 posted on 05/26/2006 2:59:03 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
I haven't really seen anything that leads me to believe the cops are in on some conspiracy to railroad these guys.

I don't do conspiracies...I prefer to save my foil for the grill!

If anything, it seems more likely they are trying to cover up a sloppy investigation in a case they expected to go nowhere but has instead mushroomed like a thermo-nuclear bomb.

That's probably true. They took a short statement and then either the Duke police or others at Duke were advised..."This will all blow over". However, Nifong started giving press conferences assailing the players and Baker met with them and then everything changed. The police then had their jobs on-line.

529 posted on 05/26/2006 3:19:40 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

I heard an Aunt or relative told a reporter that he has a rap sheet and he's a hood rat.

But, she said he's basically a good guy.

I think Cheshire chose he words very carefully when he said it's an individual well known to the Durham Police.


530 posted on 05/26/2006 3:21:46 PM PDT by Mike Nifong (Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

If she had ID'd anyone on Mar. 21, would Nifong have implored the judge to order the whole team be tested afterward? I doubt it.

What would be the consequences if there is no transcript or video of the first line-up as there was with the second?


531 posted on 05/26/2006 3:25:17 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

I am not an attorney, but I think either photo array getting into evidence sounds doubtful.


532 posted on 05/26/2006 3:28:02 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

he has a rap sheet and he's a hood rat.

_________________________________________

They are all hoodrats.

RE: the FIRST lineup.

It was on Mar 21. On Mar 23, the Nifong filed for the DNA order of 46/47 lax players. Telling.

Other time patterns of the Nifong's behavior.

4/4 2nd photo lineup. Also time the Nifong began to change tone about DNA (70-80% lie). Probably cause: SBI told Nifong no match.

4/11 DNA results public. 4/14 Illegal police invasion of Duke dorms. 4/19 indictments of Seliegeman and Finnerty.

5/2 Democrat primary. 5/3 "boyfriend" and "drivers" submit DNA. Also on 5/3 Megyn Kendall: the Nifong told the Mangums of "good news".


533 posted on 05/26/2006 3:30:52 PM PDT by OrinocoJack (Free the Ham Sammich! Disbar Nifong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies]

To: JLS; Peach; abb; maggief

The police officer who found the accuser at Kroger wrote a "supplemental report" over three weeks later:

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=local&id=4208878


534 posted on 05/26/2006 3:50:00 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

And the list grows:

1. 20 then 3 men raped her.

2. IDing 4 men when raped by 3.

3. Bedroom then bathroom.

4. Groped then raped.

5. Passed out, then able to breath through the mouth.


535 posted on 05/26/2006 3:56:27 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
If a representative of the state doesn't trust the results of its own scientific experts and those doubts are proved correct by this case, how can juries or judges be expected to trust them?

I already think the groundwork has been laid out for this argument anyways. Why did Nifong go to the private lab? Is this 'lab shopping'? Cheshire and the other defense attorneys are considering this line of questioning, at least they should be. Also, since it apparently appears Nifong made himself part of the chain of custody (he allegedly picked up the DNA results personally), doesn't this mean he could be called as a witness by the defense? Also, since he directed part of the investigation, this also means he can be questioned on the stand if I am not mistaken. I am dumbstruck at how blatantly stupid LIEfong's actions have been from the minute this story broke. It's a "What Not To Do" course in the making for those in the second year of law school.

536 posted on 05/26/2006 4:01:54 PM PDT by Carling (It's Danny, Sir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

AH-HA!! KIM said AV was afraid of the white boys.

Kim is knee deep in sh!t.


537 posted on 05/26/2006 4:03:33 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
LIEfong could not care less about Mangum. He is the one who elevated this, he is the one fostering the rapid deterioration in my belief in the justice system, he is the one who has been proved a liar on a weekly basis.

The man is a disgusting excuse for a human being. I wish him nothing but the worst after this case finally dies with a whimper.
538 posted on 05/26/2006 4:08:41 PM PDT by Carling (It's Danny, Sir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

from the article:

"..."I grabbed the female and attempted to pull her from the vehicle. She grabbed the emergency brake with her left hand and would not come out of the car. At this point, I applied a bent wrist come-along [maneuver] to her right-hand arm? once she was out of the car, I released the pressure and she collapsed to the ground......."



I liked the word "grabbed". :-)
One "grabs" a suspect and "assists" a victim, LOL!

Officer Shelton derserves a Freeper Award.


539 posted on 05/26/2006 4:08:54 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: JLS; Protect the Bill of Rights; Howlin; Peach; maggief; Jezebelle

Another article about the Mar. 21 line-up, plus a pdf copy of the defense motion concerning it:

http://www.wral.com/news/9282720/detail.html


540 posted on 05/26/2006 4:09:21 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 721-727 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson