Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
Has anyone seen this fact about the DNA being on the OUTSIDE of the nail reported in an actual news article or disclosed in a statement by defense lawyers?

I just re-watched the press conference from yesterday... this is what Cheshire said...

I don't have to get into transference with you....... You all just wait until you see the fingernail and match it up to this false accurser's statement. It will show you a tremendous amount.

snip...

In other words his only additional new evidence is she had sex other with somebody other than Dave Evans so Dave Evans gets indicted...

snip...

And first of all this has been reported as being found underneath the nail.. I don't know where you all get that. I mean I assume you would get that becaue you would think that if somebody's scratched that there would be something underneath the nail, that is something that is just put out and y'all just grabbed and ran like rabbits with... there's no evidence of that as far as I know..

But I will say this about underneath a nail.. Every expert we've talked to said if there was something that happened the way this false accuser described it that there would be blood under the nail, and there is no blood.

Sounds like he's putting some doubt out there without actually saying it wasn't under the nail.
1,638 posted on 05/16/2006 8:57:27 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1620 | View Replies ]


To: darbymcgill

Thanks. Cheshire is so correct about the media grabbing onto something, jumping to a conclusion and then running like rabbits with it. The "broomstick molestation" is a perfect example of this.


1,647 posted on 05/16/2006 9:07:03 AM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1638 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson