Replies

First off, I did not call you a troll. After reading what you posted, which included, in your words "220,000 urls for me to search" to justify your statement that date rape drugs "can cause people to think they've been raped", I said, tongue in cheek, that you sound like a troll. A Troll being someone who makes statements of fact to justify their position that have no basis in fact.

Thanks for your attempt at "educating" me, but where I live we have had in the past a huge problem with GHB and I'm very familiar with the effects. Unfortunately, your "victim" seems to have had a strange reaction to GHB in that I or no one I've heard of nor none of the 220,000 urls you sent me to has any reference to someone "thinking they've been raped" when they weren't.

Also, in one of your posts you intimated that there was no evidence that would help the defense or some such, and why would anyone think the stripper or her friend would lie? How about when this thing first started? You know, when the stripper and her stripper friend were sitting outside in the car and called the police? And said they were walking by and someone called them a "nigger"? And later said that it was not them that called? Whoops, and later said it was her? Etc, Etc.

So, trollish behavior sometimes gets you called a troll. Personally, I don't care. As they say "My giveadamn is busted". But I do care about this case. I've been there. And this whole thing has been BS from the start.

If you review what the lady said, that was the "conscious" one who did all the talking. There are many reports (from both sides in this particular case) that the AK was either unconscious, or intoxicated, throughout the time period in question.

This is simply one way to reconcile these reports.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060513/D8HIJAG00.html indicates that when the results were handed over to the defense attorney(s), and we had someone else than the Raleigh-Durham news media reporting on the situation, none of the DNA results found under the fingernail(s) linked to the two guy's already accused although it did match some of the players.

Now, coming to the vaginal swab, supposedly there was some non AV DNA in there, but none of it matched any of the players.

I do hope you can keep this straight ~ two differet sets of DNA tests. One says no players; the other says some players. Neither says "accused guys".