Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: darbymcgill
Kim did not say that the AV wasn't painting her nails in the BR. She said she didn't see her painting her nails.

Good point. On the other hand, if I recall the defense version correctly, the two women emerged from the bathroom together and left the house. So Kim should have seen the AV painting her nails if that is in fact the case. Nevertheless, this is something where Kim is in little danger of being caught in a lie - since no one else was in the bathroom, she can always say (if proof later comes out that the AV was in fact painting her nails) that she just didn't notice, that she was busy herself putting on her clothes, making cellphone calls, or whatever.

From all indications of what I have heard and can tell from the pictures, the AV's nail and the polish on the rail were pink... but if I recall the ones she had on when she got there were red...

It would be interesting to see from the photos exactly which nails were missing and what color the other nails were at the beginning of the party, and what nails were missing and what color the other nails were that appear in the photos of the AV sprawled out on the ground at 12:37. If there were additional nails on her at 12:37 that were not there at 12:00, and the additional nails are pink, and the unpainted nails are clearly not able to be mistaken for pink, then that would strongly support the idea that she was indeed putting on unpainted nails and painting them pink in the bathroom.

Also, there has been a big deal made about the 5 unpainted fake nails left in the BR. But if the search warrant said to look for red nails, maybe they left them on purpose...

Do you mean the girls may have left them there on purpose? I've read various theories on here about the girls conspiring before leaving the party to cook up the rape charge and intentionally leaving things behind with that in mind, etc., but I haven't seen any such theory that can be made to fit with the reported facts of the case.

235 posted on 04/25/2006 12:05:41 AM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: SirJohnBarleycorn
Do you mean the girls may have left them there on purpose?

No, I mean the cops... if they didn't have red nails on the warrant, could they collect any that were non-red?

Nevertheless, this is something where Kim is in little danger of being caught in a lie

This is kinda what I was getting at earlier... She was debunking all the "lies" she said were being spread around... She said the finger nail painting was a lie... And I asked, if she didn't see her painting her nails, how does she know someone saying she did it a lie. And if she says its a lie and she doesn't know if it's a lie or not, is she lying....

whew.... does that make sense?

236 posted on 04/25/2006 12:18:18 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson