Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
According to the defense, there was no evidence she had even had sex.

She didn't have to. She was "debased" and "exploited" in a cruel manner by men, who "objectified" and "oppressed" her all the while she was taking off her clothes in a completely voluntary way for her own financial gain. And besides, they were "rich" and "white", so she needs even more money. And a scholarship.

What's with that, by the way? In what sense is being stupid enough to take off your clothes in front of drunk college boys so smart that you are a "scholar"?

146 posted on 04/20/2006 7:56:55 AM PDT by 50sDad (ST3d: Real Star Trek 3d Chess: http://my.ohio.voyager.net/~abartmes/tactical.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: 50sDad

You forgot "elite".........LOL.

But I think you now hold the new record for "buzzwords" in one post!


157 posted on 04/20/2006 8:01:43 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson