Replies

If the players have nothing to hide they should offer to have their rooms/homes, cellphones, computers, cars, searched-seized and then all this would end. It would certainly speed things up. And all the party attendees names should be revealed, as well. If there's nothing to hide, then tell everything you know. Why have your school year interrupted? If I was a lacrosse player I would voluntarily provide a hair, semen, fingernail and every type of sample known to distance myself from the publicity.
But just what if she was given a date-rape drug?...that will be revealed at some point...Then what? What if the DA is holding on to this info?

No offense intended, but considering your knack for fantasizing, why don't you consider a career in writing fiction or more appropriately, children's books?

Innocent until proven guilty; remember? It is not the responsibility of the accused to prove their innocence, but the burden is upon the prosecution to prove them guilty.

Once accused of a crime, only a complete damn fool would give the prosecution the time of day unless advised to do so by his/her attorney.

Nifong has been inciting a lynch mob from the get go. Truth and justice are not driving his rabid attitude toward the accused Lacrosse players, but his political aspirations.

If Durham is burned to the ground by the raciest mobs who support the alleged victims, after the accused are proven to be innocent; blame Nifong-he provided the match.

Every white player on the team gave DNA samples voluntarily already. The defense says none matched!

Their rooms have been searched.

The authorities have a list of attendees. Why should the media have it?

I'm sure they are telling them everything they know. Believe it or not, the general public is not, nor should they be, privvy to every aspect of a criminal case that is due to be tried by a jury. In fact, both sides have talked way too much, IMHO. This is a high-profile case.

Even if she has a date rape drug in her system, is there proof that one of the players gave it to her? She could have taken an inhibition-lowering substance herself to be able to dance virtually naked.

You seem really ill-informed about this case. I suggest you go to www.thesmokinggun.com to see the actual legal documents. Every thing else has been presented through the skewed perspective of the prosecution, defense and media. We are only speculating on the information we have currently.

No thinking person without a feminazi bias can call this a legitimate case, especially against at least one of the players indicted. He appears to have an airtight alibi. Even if the other guy was there the whole time with no alibi, the bad identification of the one casts extreme doubt on the credibility of the identificaton of the other!