There are? Name one, and explain a) how you've determined that it's "irreducibly complex", b) what definition of "irreducibly complex" you're using, and c) that evolution itself could not produce a feature which was "irreducibly complex" in that manner (if that's what you're trying to imply).
Indeed, natural selection could be the sole trigger and be perfectly consistent with ID theory.
What is this "ID theory" of which you speak? Could you describe it for us? I know what "ID" is, but what scientific *theory* do you think there is concerning it? I've been waiting for that one for quite some time. Everyone talks about it, but no one seems to know what it is. Note that something has to have specific features before it can actually be properly called a "theory", make sure your response covers those criteria.
Give it up, Ichneumon. We've been beat.
It's an April Fools joke.