"When you start condemming Stallman and the software under his license..."
I already condemned Stallman. You saw me do it at least twice, and you say I didn't mean it. Conversely, when someone says something you disagree with, then they DO mean it, right? Love how you pick and choose only the info you feel is useful to whatever limb you're climbing out on at the time.
Despite the fact that it is there in black and white for all to see, your feeble little mind can't process it. There have been multiple references to my dislike of Stallman on this page; I'm beginning to think you're really so dense you can't comprehend.
And you know what? After weeks of trying to get you to provide ONE post of mine that proves anything you've said (and failing to do so on EVERY occasion), you're not in the position to be telling anyone that they have to do ANYTHING, Mr. Hypocrite. As if after ignoring my repeated requests for you to actually back up what you say, you come in barking orders about what WE should say and do, and you think we all have to jump. But, your delusions of grandeur are quite amusing.
Hilarious, actually, to say the least. It all highlights the fact that you're a miserable failure at reasoned discussion and a giant liar to boot.
How's that for condemnation?
BS, you keep posting like just above that I was lying when I called Stallman a whacko leftist, now you say he IS a whacko leftist? So when were you lying, or are you lying now?
And since he is a whacko leftist, whether you are admitting it now or ever again, why do you mind me pointing it out to others that he is? Because ~75% of all open source uses his license? Or that he speaks at the UN all the time and they created a division there to help his efforts? You like his "manifesto", or you like his beard? Must be some reason, cause you really get worked up LOL. I say "Stallman" the flamer turns into Mt Saint Helens LMAO.