Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration
a Whale is not an animal, but a fish.

Can you show us the gills on a whale?

By the way, you still haven't gotten around to telling us how many legs a locust has, whether a hare chews its cud, whether bats and birds are the same, and where the evidence for a world-wide flood is.

131 posted on 03/24/2006 4:35:18 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs

The two pectoral fins on a fish are a clear indication that fish are our bipedalar ancestors. Just think how many millions of years it took for that unintelligently undesigned process to work itself out!


138 posted on 03/24/2006 4:44:01 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: Gumlegs

Sure. In them famous embryology fake pics.


163 posted on 03/24/2006 5:02:35 PM PST by furball4paws (Awful Offal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: Gumlegs
Whale is not an animal, but a fish. Can you show us the gills on a whale?

Why would a whale need gills to be a fish?

Only in a narrow definition.

In the broad definition, a whale is a fish, since he is in the sea.

Whale: Any of the larger fish-like marine mammals....(Compact Oxford English Dictionary)

By the way, you still haven't gotten around to telling us how many legs a locust has, whether a hare chews its cud, whether bats and birds are the same, and where the evidence for a world-wide flood is.

I guess you haven't been looking to hard.

Since you won't believe what is clearly shown by God's creation,(Ps.19), He is under no obligation to reveal anything else to you.

(Rom.1:20-32)

167 posted on 03/24/2006 5:03:49 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson