I already linked your post history twice, which shows you posting on all the latest Linux threads which of course all turned out to be lies. Most guys could find their history on their own, but not the flamer, LOL. If it doesn't involve insults or cluelessly posting lies, he can forget it.
So, the criteria for lying is posting on Linux threads?
Wouldn't that make you a liar too?
Of course, you ARE a liar, but I've pointed out your lies by linking directly to specific posts that you've made. I've requested you do the same, but you repeatedly refuse to do so.
"Most guys could find their history on their own..."
I know what my history is, and that's not what I'm asking you for, and quite frankly, it's amusing how difficult it is for you to comprehend this. I'm asking for specific posts of mine that you say are lies. I'm not asking for my posting history, because I already know where to find that. I'm asking you to specify WHICH of my posts you think are lies, especially those dealing with Google OS, Linux deployment at IBM, and Dell making Linux desktops, the latest three subjects about which you said that I lied. You know, the same stuff I've been asking you to show me for weeks now. Why will you not back up your lies with any sort of proof?
Of course, I expected this. You lie about everything, even (especially) me. And, you have to keep lying to cover your tracks about your lies. Then you lie about covering your tracks.
Wouldn't it be easier to just tell the truth, Turkey?