Replies

Lying to cover my tracks? LOL, this is coming from someone who wants to give free software to communists and tries to constantly cover it up.

And I surely didn't libel that guy, he's so devoted to Stallmam he's over on other sites talking about "recruits" to "the cause", which I simply linked to.

But instead of admitting I exposed yet another looney fanatic, you accuse me of libel! Classic!!!

LOL, this is coming from someone who wants to give free software to communists and tries to constantly cover it up.

Distraction won't work. Show me how you didn't lie.

And I surely didn't libel that guy, he's so devoted to Stallmam he's over on other sites talking about "recruits" to "the cause"

You continue the libel. "recruits" to "the cause" was framing another poster's political argument, in the context of saying that is not the way to go.

A parallel. Let's say Dick Cheney says "You have all these people running around in Russia saying 'I'm a communist,' and they'll fail because of it." You then say he's a communist using his quote "I'm a communist."

In his postings (that you linked to), he explicitly stated that he opposed the ideological and promotes Linux on its merits alone. In those postings he himself trashed Stallman and was attacked for it by the ideologues. How about this juicy one:

Stallman is a whackjob. Every time he speaks it's diarrhea of the mouth. Stallman's ideology is one of the biggest roadblocks to both Linux on the desktop, and OSS on the desktop. And when it's seemingly that we've come across one roadblock, Stallman erects another one.

Oh yeah, really "devoted to Stallmam." I don't believe you have even trashed Stallman that badly. Could you be any more blatantly libelous in mischaracterizing this FReeper? And his approach to popularizing Linux?

Being pragmatic and showing how linux/OSS is the superior product is the way to win this battle.

Oh my god, he believes his favorite product is superior and would like it to win fairly in the marketplace on its merits. Commie alert!