Here, he complains that Cedega's not free
No I didn't, I wondered why you were advocating purchasing a product to emmulate something, instead of just buying the original to begin with.
mocks another user for suggesting that Cedega be free
Nope, I was guessing that particular poster didn't like it since they charge a price to use it, and most of you open source guys want everything to be free.
then complains that Linux is free
No, I was specifically complaining that China takes a free copy of Red Hat, from North Carolina, and renames and resells it as "Red Flag" in China, something you're obviously perfectly content with.
and here he is, recommending free Solaris
Sure was, and always have, since it's not GPL and uses a US commercial license that prevents the Chinese from forking it off on their own, like you approve of them doing with Linux, which is GPL based.
criticizing Linux because it doesn't run Windows apps
Simply responding to someone's claim that Linux ran commercial apps perfectly, when in fact it runs very very few.
recommending Solaris, which doesn't run Windows apps
I never said that it did, I simply recommend most any software that isn't GPL, or has the copyrights controlled by Richard Stallman etc.
...and Apple
That's right, a great product, and not given away to the Iranians and Cubans and Chicoms like you love to do with your Linux.
criticizing others for namecalling
Which is about all I get from you people, since you refuse to address the dangers of giving free technology to North Korea and other anti-US governments, which you clearly support.
makes more false accusations of ME
Hardly, those are right on the money as I showed later in the thread by linking your comments. Besides you're such an easy target it's hard not to get a complete broadside.
Here he is claiming that Red Hat has a couple of hundred Linux kernel developers
Another one of your bald faced lies, check the link for yourself, I said "Linux developers", not "Linux kernel developers" as you claimed I said.
he hijacked the Open Source Ping List
| ROFL, that is hysterical, you boys claim you like open source, but when somebody else tries to use your supposed open source you howl like a stuck pig. Truly shows you boys are afraid to practice what you preach.
using bold fonts to make a point
Simply trying to make the point with you that giving free technology to brutal regimes in dangerous, since you obviously disagree and want to attack me for pointing your position on the issue out to everyone.
defending Microsoft's contributions to Planned Parenthood
No I was proving that the poster who said Bill Gate's donations went to abortions was a lie, since their donation agreements to various organizations strictly prohibit it being used for that purpose.
Thanks for linking those, so everyone who's interested can see the context and who the perpetual liar is, being you, the obsessed Stallman worshiper you apparently and misfortunately are. Believe me, with a name like "FLAMING DEATH", no one is surprised you're a deranged raving lunatic anyway.
Guess I hit a nerve.
"LOL, with your skills that must have taken a couple of weeks."
Imagine how long it would have taken you. You can't even find what you posted the day before.
Most of what you said speaks for itself, and your spinning isn't going to change what you clearly said, so no rebuttal for most of your post is necessary. But a few of your denials are positively priceless, so I'll talk about them here...
"Hardly, those [accusations] are right on the money as I showed later in the thread by linking your comments. Besides you're such an easy target it's hard not to get a complete broadside."
You linked to my posting history and one specific comment, which was, by the way, yours, not mine. If you think this proves anything, then you probably need to get started on that GED. You have failed on every opportunity to provide me with just ONE of my comments that proves what you say. This is because you are a pathological liar.
"Another one of your bald faced lies, check the link for yourself, I said "Linux developers", not "Linux kernel developers" as you claimed I said."
Here are your exact words:
"Typical, you make these broad assertions of fact but never have any proof. Red Hat has literally hundreds of kernel devs and you have no proof of how many total contributions they have made. They came up with RPM, which is the standard package manager, to start." - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1527263/posts?page=49#49
Unbelieveable. I just caught you lying again. Do you ever get tired of getting spanked?
"using bold fonts to make a point
Simply trying to make the point..."
And criticizing others for doing the same. Where I come from, that makes you one of those "hypocrites".
"No I was proving that the poster who said Bill Gate's donations went to abortions was a lie, since their donation agreements to various organizations strictly prohibit it being used for that purpose."
Yeah, and as we all know, once you give Planned Parenthood money, you can really trust them to do the right thing with it, huh? Amazing what you'll justify in order to try to save your horribly damaged credibility.
"Thanks for linking those, so everyone who's interested can see the context and who the perpetual liar is, being you..."
Your words speak for themselves, but you're too dense to realize your credibility just got taken to the woodshed.
"the obsessed Stallman worshiper you apparently and misfortunately are. "
Another lie from the pathological liar. Find a post where I've said anything, positive or negative, about Stallman. Oh wait, you're still working on finding a post where I said something about Dell making desktops, IBM deploying Linux, and Google making an OS.
Why do you lie so much? Don't we have enough to argue about without you making stuff up out of thin air? Seriously, this whole thing is fascinating for me, because I don't believe I've ever met such a habitual liar in real life. That's a good thing, BTW.
So, why DO you feel it necessary to lie so much? And, once again, where have I said anything about Google OS, Dell making Linux desktops, Linux deployment within IBM, or now, anything about liking Richard Stallman? Why can't you give me ONE POST that backs up what you say, instead choosing to fling more lies to cover your trail?
You: Another one of your bald faced lies, check the link for yourself, I said "Linux developers", not "Linux kernel developers" as you claimed I said.
A post of yours reads: Red Hat has literally hundreds of kernel devs
Whoops! You did later start saying Linux developers. So are you just lying or can we chalk this up to ignorance as to what Linux actually is? Don't be ashamed, a lot of the non-technical public gets confused.