Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Why Won't The Media Touch This Book?

'cause you're a moonbat?

1 posted on 01/21/2006 4:40:55 PM PST by toddlintown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: toddlintown

You lost. Deal with it.


2 posted on 01/21/2006 4:42:18 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
Why Won't The Media Touch This Book?

Because it's nuttier than a Chinese Chicken Salad?

3 posted on 01/21/2006 4:42:18 PM PST by JRios1968 ("Cogito, ergo FReep": I think, therefore I FReep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
This particular book is a major topic of discussion in many leftwingnut websites. They're really eating it up.

The fact that the book is also telling the Democrats they are too stupid to show up for an election is generally overlooked and the leftwingnuts take great offense at that suggestion.

As far as I'm concerned, this book is of a piece with the leftwingnut story that Karl Rove has a hurricane generator.

4 posted on 01/21/2006 4:44:03 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
Hmm.. Washington Governor's race. Not in the book? Then it has absolutely no redeeming value other than stealing money away from a future RAT campaign, so I hope that they get tremendous publicity.
5 posted on 01/21/2006 4:44:23 PM PST by kingu (Liberalism: The art of sticking your fingers in your ears and going NANANANA..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

IBTZ?


6 posted on 01/21/2006 4:44:32 PM PST by realpatriot (Some spelling errers entionally included!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

Mark "Crispin" Miller, as in half-baked or partially fried. Moonbat-on-a-stick indeed.


7 posted on 01/21/2006 4:44:47 PM PST by King Moonracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
They stole it not just in Ohio, but all throughout the USA, from coast to coast.

They stole it not by using any single ploy, but through a stealthy combination of computerized vote theft,

Diebold had voting machines in one minor Ohio county.

Computerized voting machines were using in 14 percent of Ohio counties, the largest of which were controlled by Dems.

But this makes me happy - as long as the hard left continues to seek conspiracy theories as to why the Dems have lost the last three elections, instead of realizing that hard-left views are an albatross on the Democratic Party, the Dems will continue to lose ground.

8 posted on 01/21/2006 4:45:52 PM PST by dirtboy (My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

IBTZOT?


9 posted on 01/21/2006 4:46:16 PM PST by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
Memo To Mark Crispin Miller:
Typical Idiot!
Click the Pic

10 posted on 01/21/2006 4:46:36 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown; PJ-Comix

ping!


12 posted on 01/21/2006 4:48:11 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
They're listening!


14 posted on 01/21/2006 4:50:04 PM PST by QwertyKPH (I didn't do it, nobody saw me do it, you can't prove anything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

Yeah, the story out there in plain sight and in public sources has eluded the MSM why? Because they're in Bush's pocket....? Yeah....right.


15 posted on 01/21/2006 4:50:26 PM PST by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
Miller performs the simple but increasingly rare act of journalism and gathers a mountain of overwhelming evidence from publicly available material.

If they'd honor him for that, then they should be having a halleluey chorus for Able Danger's public data mining.

16 posted on 01/21/2006 4:51:44 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

from New Zeland? You must be a POM with a case of kiwi flu...


20 posted on 01/21/2006 5:07:29 PM PST by xcamel (Exposing clandestine operations is treason. 13 knots make a noose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

We shouldn't forget that Kerry had won the election and the left were rejoicing SIX hours BEFORE the actual vote count started. Every indication was (to the leftist kooks) that they had won in a landslide and they were everywhere gloating and rejoicing. All that came crashing down once the actual votes were counted and they were obviously way behind.

They had to invent a kook story about the Bush automated vote stealing machines in order to rectify their belief that it was over before it really started.

They're losers, will always be losers, and they will explain every election as stolen until they get a President who wins with 43% of the vote, and they'll call that a mandate.


21 posted on 01/21/2006 5:07:31 PM PST by putupjob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
Bush/Cheney stole their re-election in 2004.

They stole it not just in Ohio, but all throughout the USA, from coast to coast. They stole it not by using any single ploy, but through a stealthy combination of computerized vote theft, bureaucratic monkey business, systematic shortages of viable equipment and old-fashioned dirty tricks, including rampant bullying, disinformation and obstructionism.

Prof Mark Crispin Miller (NYU)....from the cuckoo's nest


23 posted on 01/21/2006 5:16:51 PM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
I sent Mr. Miller explaining to him that he is a moonbat. Just got this back as a reply. I'm lost: "Paul Lehto on those who need to call us "bat shait [sic] crazy": Given the near universal treatment by the parties and the press on both the Left and the Right that fancy themselves "responsible," can we now "understand" (as in "able to explain, without justifying") why the Soviets placed dissidents in mental hospitals? Here's why: If you challenge beliefs that are very widespread and fundamental then the system can not deal with it, and concludes that the dissident must be crazy and in need of hospitalization. And then, once hospitalized, as a matter of true fact ('ve represented people and gotten them out of mental hospitals) as a patient any anger you may show, or questioning of one's status, or refusal to accept one's "disagnosis", or "uppity" behavior generally is then regarded as simply more evidence of a deteriorating mental condition and "decompensation" of the mental patient. The perfect Catch-22 occurs when you are wrongly diagnosed with a particular mental condition (or if you are not even mentally ill at all) in which case one's failure to fully accept the lie of your diagnosis or else making the decision to challenge the terms of your detention is simply cause to send you back to the mental hospital for even more intensive "treatment." That being said, it's really not all that bad in talking to people. Almost all of those "against" us are totally unprepared with facts, they counter mainly with belief. There are also many people ready to listen and who are in fact listening, and many more who will look at you and wonder why it took you so long to figure it all out. But for those other many who find their fundamental beliefs challenged by information about the abysmal state of our elections, you will find those person's minds running away from a fair analysis of the information presented about as fast as most people would run away from a mental hospital stay. As I like to say, our system will not be preserved by maintaining a panglossian confidence in it, our system, like freedom itself, is maintained by being vigilant and skeptical in its defense. From: Mark Crispin Miller To: mark.miller@nyu.edu Subject: Here's where both parties AND the press agree Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:53:43 -0500 And "the press," so far, includes The Nation, Mother Jones, Salon.... Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:57:36 -0800 (PST) From: Subject: RE: Why Won't The Media Touch This Book? To: mark.miller@nyu.edu DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; Answer: Because you're bat shait crazy! you have no proof & nothing in your book is true. cb
26 posted on 01/21/2006 5:53:22 PM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Miller should peddle this crap to Dan Brown. He has a knack for getting BS published.


27 posted on 01/21/2006 9:30:29 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

Paul Craig Roberts and Dick Clarke... any chance they know each other, eh, real well?


28 posted on 01/21/2006 9:32:56 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
This is why:


29 posted on 01/22/2006 2:11:10 PM PST by Lady Jag ( All I want is a kind word, a warm bed, and unlimited power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson