There are so many movies- millions?- made depicting women as sex objects, so I'm surprised it's taken this long for a movie like this to be made. You'd have to put a gun to most straight guy's heads to make them watch this, but whatever floats your boat.
But what steams me is how they equate this nonsense with Rosa Parks or some such- like it's some kind of holy thing. "First gay kiss", first gay this or that", like they're dealing with anti-slavery- or some decent cause.
Amen to that!
Does anyone remember when "Klute" and "Looking for Mr. Goodbar" were released? The Left went intensely apey over THOSE films, too.
Just look at their history of taste and you'll find that whatever the Left goes apey over, is a good idea will be objectionable, nauseating and hideous.
This is one of those films that is objectionable, nauseating and hideous and so, thus, the Left goes apey. Cries. Writes article after article.
I've deduced this all down to the fact that most people, your average person, is heterosexual, conservative about fiscal matters, somewhat tolerant of other people as long as they don't mess with the yard/car/house/kids/local parks/grocerystore/streets nearby/publicpool/privatepool/dogs/cats/utilities/job(s)/lunchbreak/coffee/coffeebreak/retirementplans/savingsandloans/fishingspot/quiltingbee/gardenclub/rotarymeetings/andmostofallTHETRUCK...
But that these articles, these disgusting "films" and performances and oozes over awful are the result of the minority devoting far more intensity and time to write about abnormalities.
And so the rest of us, we're left to write about it.
I agree. It is sick to equate sexual perversion with civil rights.