Skip to comments.
Do you think it's time to reverse Roe v. Wade? [FR Straw Poll]
FR
| 10/12/05
| Us
Posted on 10/11/2005 10:21:13 PM PDT by nunya bidness
Begging Jim's indulgence I think it's appropriate to ask the question that is at the heart of the Harriet Miers nomination.
Do you think it's time to reverse Roe v. Wade?
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abortion; roevwade; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
I say yes. What say you?
To: nunya bidness
2
posted on
10/11/2005 10:25:43 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: Jim Robinson
Would you consider making this a forum wide poll?
To: Howlin; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; redrock; AuntB
To: nunya bidness
Yes, I do believe so.
After that, I want abortion/infanticide/fetus killing/whatever you want to call it, forbidden by way of amending the United States Constitution.
Who can say with any honesty that Washington, Madison, or Jefferson would not find this practice so hideous and evil that banning it would require not a second thought?
5
posted on
10/11/2005 10:28:59 PM PDT
by
jla
(I support Aunt Harriet Miers)
To: nunya bidness
Past time, even though I live in a state that will keep it.
6
posted on
10/11/2005 10:29:47 PM PDT
by
trubluolyguy
(I am conservative. That is NOT the same thing as Republican. Don't place party over principle.)
To: nunya bidness
7
posted on
10/11/2005 10:29:55 PM PDT
by
Spiff
(Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
To: holdonnow; Freedom Rocks...; Tony Snow; Sean Hannity
To: nunya bidness
Nope. Unless we abolish large chunks of welfare legislation at the same time, it would become a prescription for bankruptcy, worse than Social Security. Although the same logic will operate at the state, instead of the federal level, so the change might be only nominal [in which case nothing much changes, and bankruptcy threat does not apply].
9
posted on
10/11/2005 10:31:31 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: nunya bidness
Yes. Let it go back to the states, and let serious reforms commence!!! There are times (few and far between IMO) that this might be necessary (ectopic pgs, etc) but not just for any old 'aw, pregnancy will make me fat!' and 'I'm just not ready for motherhood' crap reasons. Let's get some serious
accountability going here!!!
10
posted on
10/11/2005 10:32:08 PM PDT
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX)
To: AnnaZ; Mercuria; incindiary
To: nunya bidness
To: nunya bidness; ~Kim4VRWC's~; ~Vor~; 1Mike; 1stMarylandRegiment; 3catsanadog; A CA Guy; ...
13
posted on
10/11/2005 10:41:27 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: nunya bidness
14
posted on
10/11/2005 10:44:53 PM PDT
by
onyx
((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
To: Howlin
Back to the States, as our Constitution was written
15
posted on
10/11/2005 10:46:14 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
To: nunya bidness
To: jla
Who can say with any honesty that Washington, Madison, or Jefferson would not find this practice so hideous and evil that banning it would require not a second thought? Something very serious, for everyone to think about. jla's got a very valid point.
To: nunya bidness
18
posted on
10/11/2005 10:54:43 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: nunya bidness
Yes.
19
posted on
10/11/2005 10:55:41 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: nunya bidness
20
posted on
10/11/2005 10:57:19 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson