Leaving aside the fact that Pamela Anderson has Hepatitis C (instant disqualifier if the fact is known), 98% of human males would "go for it" if they had the chance.
I'm sorry. ;)
Or how about a good girl that may not be a double d but has diginity and character?
Those things are only important to a man after he has become physically attracted to her. You don't have to look like Pamela Anderson, but if you don't look good to the man in question, it's all over. A woman, on the other hand, starts out interested in men who appear to have those qualities, and for her, the physical attraction develops later.
We are biologically different, and it's no use blaming the opposite sex for having hard-wired programming that doesn't feel attraction in the same order.
Do men honestly believe these women in porn are sweet and kind?
No. We are well aware that most of them have serious psychological problems.
Ping to Mr. Jeeves Note above.
"98%" would bed Pamela Anderson? Sources please.
Many of us would not touch her for spiritual reasons, having no desire to be "one flesh" with her. There is a profound bond at the emotional, psychological and spiritual level created in carnal knowledge. It's not just physical.
The women who bed multiple partners are not the only one with psychological problems. Hugh Hefner, for example, is a sick man who's figured out a way to degrade women to sex objects, use them and profit off the males who fantasize about those messed-up, beautiful women. And Larry Flynt is sicker yet.
And those males who subsidize soft/hard porn are voyeurs with too much testosterone and too little character--which probem can be resolved--as with all sin including those of yours truly--only by turning to God.