Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Jeeves; Dashing Dasher; Army Air Corps; Libertina; Victoria Delsoul; SandyInSeattle; ...

"98%" would bed Pamela Anderson? Sources please.

Many of us would not touch her for spiritual reasons, having no desire to be "one flesh" with her. There is a profound bond at the emotional, psychological and spiritual level created in carnal knowledge. It's not just physical.

The women who bed multiple partners are not the only one with psychological problems. Hugh Hefner, for example, is a sick man who's figured out a way to degrade women to sex objects, use them and profit off the males who fantasize about those messed-up, beautiful women. And Larry Flynt is sicker yet.

And those males who subsidize soft/hard porn are voyeurs with too much testosterone and too little character--which probem can be resolved--as with all sin including those of yours truly--only by turning to God.


417 posted on 10/03/2005 11:45:45 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]


To: Blurblogger
You are speaking of a learned, practiced, catechised creed. I am speaking of biology and the subconscious mind.

You would be shocked at how many ostensibly Christian men would be all over a disease-free Pamela Anderson-type in two seconds if they thought they had a chance with her. Because they realize they don't have a chance (or because of learned fears) they are free to grumble about sin and and how they would never do such a thing and how the world doesn't measure up to their standards. It's a defense mechanism - and the louder they protest, the more they've been thinking about it.

But when put to the test, biology speaks louder than any creed. I'll stick to the 98% estimate. ;)

424 posted on 10/03/2005 11:57:27 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (Speaking several languages is an asset; keeping your mouth shut in one is priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger
Hugh Hefner, for example, is a sick man who's figured out a way to degrade women to sex objects, use them and profit off the males who fantasize about those messed-up, beautiful women.

I agree. Hugh Hefner is a big time liberal and a frequent contributor to the DNC. No self-respecting conservative would emulate the likes of Hug Hefner nor would he or she be burdened by such self-degrading behavior.

450 posted on 10/03/2005 7:20:44 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger

Thank you so much for that post!!! Hugs!


451 posted on 10/03/2005 8:41:11 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson