The Guild 6-14-2005 Superstitions about Dreams and Meanings of Dreams

6-14-2005

[mountaineer]

She did not receive the courtesy of an explanation, IG.

[mountaineer]

Do you suppose there was a moment, just an instant, when she asked herself, "I wonder if making this sex video ever will come back to haunt me"?

R&B diva Eve has discovered that fame's garden has some serpents. The singer, 26, is mortified now that Internet voyeurs are feasting their eyes on a homemade sex tape she made when she was 21. The footage, which we've seen, shows Eve and her then-boyfriend, Bad Boy Entertainment producer Stevie J., making use of a sex toy. The clip, dated Nov. 20, 1999, lasts only 30 seconds, but it's every bit as explicit as Paris Hilton's infamous tape.

A spokeswoman for the star of "Barbershop" and UPN's "Eve" says the "personal tape" was made "years ago with her boyfriend of over two years. The fact that a private moment is being made public is a violation, and we would hope that people would respect her privacy as they would their own. Legal action has been taken to have it removed immediately."

A friend of the singer confides, "She's devastated by this. She's hired a private investigator. She can't figure out how this got out. [Stevie J.] says he has nothing to do with it and is also horrified because he has kids." Rush & Molloy

Whew! For a moment there I was afraid Christina Aguilera had left her skanky past behind:

Christina Aguilera gave her fiancé, Jordan Bratman, a birthday party he'll never forget the other night at Scores. The Grammy winner rolled into the W. 28th St. booty palace around midnight. After inviting 10 dancers to show their moves in the Champagne Room, Jordan chose his four favorites to join the couple in the President's Room for complete privacy.

Well, almost complete. A mole says Christina did a little stripping of her own and shared a kiss with a Beyoncé lookalike named Jade. The exhausted lovebirds left around 6 a.m. (Rush & Molloy)

[BigWaveBetty]

Did you get your happy anniversary wishes in the mail to Web Hubbell?

Ten years ago today, Webster Hubbell, the former No. 3 official at the Justice Department, was sentenced to 21 months in prison for bilking clients of the law firm where he and Hillary Rodham Clinton were partners.

[daisyscarlett]

Please say it is not so...Hillary's Lovely Legs banned forever? Anything we can do or say to alter this decision?

[EveningStar]

Bumping from the West Coast (where it isn't even 9am yet).

[Syncro]

It seems she doesn't like this place and wanted to be martyred.

You don't diss the owner of a site in your every post and expect to be given a pass.

Her recent attacks on Republican Politicians running for office probably didn't help either.

JIMO

[EveningStar]

Do you have any examples of her dissing the owner of the site?

[Syncro]

First of all as a disclaimer, I have zero interest in HLL.

But after her making a false statement about me, I noticed her every post insulted this site and Jim Robinson.

You don't put a horse head in your bed and then scream, Look what they did to me!

I imagine you post to her, take a look at her posts the last few weeks or so.

[EveningStar]

If you're talking about that tagline, that was directed at YOU and not Jim, and you know that.

[Syncro]

That doesn't make sense but if that is what you were told, believe what ever you want.

I didn't see it as another personal attack on me.

But if you say so, fine.

[EveningStar]

You say you have no interest in HLL. Yet, a few weeks back you came onto a thread to take a shot at her. And here you are again.

[EveningStar]

It wasn't a personal attack. It was in response to you following her around on threads and attacking her.

[pubmom]

I sure wish she was here to defend herself against these "allegations."

[EveningStar]

Jim, I hope you're reading this. I forgot to ping you before. As I have said, HLL's tagline is directed at Syncro and not at you. You will notice that it does not appear on her posts until after he posts to her on that thread.

[Syncro]

A shot? How absurd. Read the thread. She was taking shots at a Republican Member of Congress.

She could have been anyone and I would have called her/him on it.

If her tagline was directed at me, it was a personal attack. And with no basis. Just like her post to me on that thread. No basis.

Following her around on threads and attacking her... LOL

You want to see attacks, take the time to read her comments on the thread don't just accept what she tells you.

IMO she is quite pretty, I don't see why she has to diss Katherine Harris to make herself feel better.

Take you time finding me attacking her, you won't find any. I have pointed out to more than one poster it is counterproductive to attack conservatives.

Thanks for pinging Jim, I didn't want to bother him about something as petty as this. I imagine he has his reasons for banning her.

[Syncro]

17 Withdraw thy foot from thy neighbour's house; lest he be weary of thee, and so hate thee. 18 A man that beareth false witness against his neighbour is a maul, and a sword, and a sharp arrow.

[EveningStar]

I read the thread. She simply made a comment on the person's unfortunate use of cosmetics. She did not attack a "Republican Member of Congress."

[Syncro]

She sat next to these:

How she got them from Harris, I have no idea but she should have gotten them signed...

Good spin EveningStar. If you approve of her actions fine. I don't think it bodes well for the Conservative cause.

Oh, I am sure you can see by now that I didn't attack HLL either, right?

I merely pointed out that when she ran for office no one made fun of her appearance and that we should stick with the issues. Obviously she got defensive and posts an absurd statement and a condescending remark. I've seen her do that before to others when she doesn't have an intelligent answer.

I think this has gone far enough.

[EveningStar]

She made an honest comment about the lady's appearance. She was not the only one to do so on that thread. I don't know how that reflects on the conservative cause.

As for negative comments about Republican members of Congress, I seen plenty here at FR directed at Frist, Voinovich, McCain, Delay, and many others.

[Syncro]

She made an honest comment about the lady's appearance. She was not the only one to do so on that thread. I don't know how that reflects on the conservative cause.

I went back and very carefully read the whole thread. And you are 100% correct. She was not the only one to make honest comments on Harris' appearance.

Although I doubt the honesty of the dig about the transplants. I know of many shallow women that don't look anywhere as striking as Katherine Harris that would not hesitate to say she has transplants.

You're so convinced that is an "honest" comment, find me the link that proves she has had transplants. Or realize you have been sucked in to defending a lie.

ALL the other comments about Harris' looks were POSTIVE. If you are going to engage me do so with something that you can back up. I'm not going to take anymore time to do your research for you to prove you wrong.

If you and your friends want to support those that can find nothing more to do than make snide remarks about Conservative Politicians you may as well come right out and state you are working for the liberal cause. You sure are helping it.

Bear in mind here we were talking about digs about a person's appearance, not (as in the case of Frist, Voinovich, McCain, Delay, and many others) political views.

Try to stay on task.

I don't have much more to say to you unless you can back up your statements. There are plenty of sites that support you and your friends tactics. As I am sure you know.