Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom

Your question assumes that opera possesses intrinsic merits, a contention with which several FReepers would take issue. ;)

Seriously, that's a good question and one which I must ponder. For the sake of consistency, if I had to do it right this second, I'm afraid I'd have to argue that the original work is superior, if for no other reason than its originality.

My stance is indeed quite harsh, but then, no one's ever accused me of being a big softie.


78 posted on 05/16/2005 12:17:57 PM PDT by Xenalyte (End women's suffrage! Hasn't the country suffered enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Xenalyte

How about Shakespeare? Shakespeare borrowed a lot of his plots from other stories. Not many people claim his work suffers because of that, or that the originals were better.

Besides, Hollywood can't write anyway, so they might as well try to steal from those who can.


81 posted on 05/16/2005 12:27:08 PM PDT by JenB (Brain the size of a planet, and they have me opening doors...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Xenalyte
Touche... but I'm more disgusted at the practice of producing vapid, shoddy sequels then I am about re-using source material. (Though if I have to hear about yet one more movie based on an old TV show, I think I'm going to puke.)

To me, that is what really shows intellectual bankruptcy.

82 posted on 05/16/2005 12:31:07 PM PDT by kevkrom ("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." -- Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson