I disagree! Sinkspur has been around a long time and he and I are often on opposite sides in opinion. His debate is civil and attempts to employ calm rationale. Yours, on the other hand, are shrill and you protest way too much. I question your bonafides.
That is absolutely not true. I mean, that's proven to be untrue on this very thread. And every thread where anyone disagrees with him. I'm sure he doesn't care. But no need to say something that is so obviously not true.
Dear 68 grunt,
"I disagree! Sinkspur has been around a long time and he and I are often on opposite sides in opinion. His debate is civil and attempts to employ calm rationale."
Well, sinkspur is actually my friend, and we're often on the SAME sides of issues. Not always, but often. Likely well more than half of the time.
And as much as we disagree on somethings, I will always count him my friend.
However, you praise him in absence of the thing for which you claim him worthy.
Here is a bit of sinkspur on this thread:
***
You're part of the problem, dirtbag.
You and your knuckle-dragging cohorts are not going to dominate this forum.
Nobody supported starving anybody; it's just that you, and others with shoe-sized IQs, have such a limited mental capacity to make distinctions and to support the rule of law, that you had to characterize those who didn't roll in the dirt as "murderers."
Relish your sanctimony. It's all you've got.
388 posted on 04/01/2005 8:34:23 PM EST by sinkspur (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
***
That seems a bit past "civil," and employs absolutely no "calm rationale."
It's certainly not the worst post on the thread, but it's pretty far from "civil," "calm," or engendering any sort of intelligent discussion. It's just the hurling of insults.
In fact, you call your poster shrill, yet many of sinkspur's posts ON THIS VERY THREAD, including the one cited above, are quite shrill.
sitetest