Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: badbass

It would be a basis for a dissolution of marriage (a Fla. term for what evryone else knows as divorce) if one of the parties to the litigation chooses to assert it a basis for the allegation that the marriage is irretreivably broken. But adultery itself is not a bais for the state to undertake unilateral action to become a party to a divorce that neither party to the marriage has brought. The arguments raised here have become ever increasingly bizarre and outlandish.


326 posted on 03/28/2005 1:15:13 PM PST by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: middie
The arguments raised here have become ever increasingly bizarre and outlandish.

Thanks for the info. As I've replied umpteen times to the divorce bit, stating that I'm pretty sure Terry Schiavo's parents did request a divorce (as Terry is unable), I'll just say this in response to your statement about "bizarre and outlandish" arguments: If your child (who was innocent of any wrongdoing) was going to be killed with the sanction of the state, you'd probably get that way as well.

I have no problem extrapolating other people's circumstances to my possible future circumstances, or possibly my young daughters'. What's "bizarre and outlandish" is the fact the the State of Florida is killing an innocent woman, whose so called POS "husband" possibly put her in the "brain dead" condition to begin with. This same POS "husband" whose shacked up with some whore and now has 2 kids by her, but still has his "wife's" best interest in mind. Yeah, right. What's "bizarre and outlandish" is people's non-reaction to this event.

337 posted on 03/28/2005 2:00:10 PM PST by badbass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson