Judgenfuhrer Greer: "I piss on the law and the Constitution.
Subpoenas for the US Congress aren't even worth a bucket of warm spit around here.
"18 USC Section 1505 - we urinate on it. Title 2 of the US code, we deficate on it."
No, absolutely not! I'm against bridging the separation of powers between the three branches. I'm against letting emotion override the law.
Judgenfuhrer Greer: "I piss on the law and the Constitution.
Subpoenas for the US Congress aren't even worth a bucket of warm spit around here.
"18 USC Section 1505 - we urinate on it. Title 2 of the US code, we deficate on it."
Well, you're pretty much screwed, then, because unless you embrace your emotions and stop thinking clearly, and if you continue to try to interject rational arguments and facts into the conversation, well, you're a "nazi", a "Satan-worshipper", a "member of the cult of death", a "liberal" ad nauseum...
I'm sorry, not sure which question you're answering with "Absolutely not". You're absolutely not against feeding tubes? You're absolutely not against starving persons of lower mental capacity?
On separation of powers, I agree but it appears that it's the judicial branch that has overridden it's powers and is not being checked by the others (besides blustering). As to emotion over the law, is there ever a time to "go against the law"? If so, when and why?