To: auggy
She's their test case, donchaknow. That and the whole Scientology, Soros, Let's kill those we don't want around crowd, maybe even something unspeakable or actually evil. I found this a little while ago, at the bottom: "The "I Love You But Please Die" Syndrome Embodied in Federal Law: Under the current estate tax law pushed through by the Bush Administration in 2001, the inheritance tax drops from 45% to 0% on January 1, 2010, then rises to 55% on January 1, 2011. [Q to FR: true???]] By one estimate, there will be six million estates of over $1 million settled over the next few decades, so the stakes are high, indeed. The common law evolved in sizable part to handle inheritance issues, but the Right to Die laws emerged during recent decades when we've largely stopped talking publicly about estates, so there is a potential for contradiction. The question of conflict of interest in right-to-die cases is a very serious one.." See: http://isteve.blogspot.com/2005/03/inside-story-on-schiavo-case.html
24 posted on
03/27/2005 6:56:37 PM PST by
combat_boots
(Dug in and not budging an inch.)
To: combat_boots
i hope you realize how right you are...this IS the Roe v Wade for the euthanasia "death ghouls". scientology is very much involved in this whole tragic mess and i'm sure any real investigation into this case will bear that out.
50 posted on
03/27/2005 8:15:17 PM PST by
kingattax
(If you're cross-eyed and dyslexic, can you read all right ?)
To: combat_boots
"The "I Love You But Please Die" Syndrome Embodied in Federal Law: Precisely. Hearsay evidence in a "right to die" case is now controlling, and the federal courts have said they have no interest in reversing this. That's called "precedence."
59 posted on
03/27/2005 9:12:05 PM PST by
My2Cents
(America is divided along issues of morality, between the haves and the have-nots.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson