Don't know what some of us would do on here without you, Dog Gone, Torie, and others that know the law. Thank you for posting the facts.
It is like some of these vanities are being slanted with the purpose of getting people riled up and it is wrong.
I do not want activists judges.
It is somewhat understandable. Congress intended that the federal court retry the case on the merits. But alas the substantive federal law as to the merits is not in the Schindler's favor, and the case will be rendered moot on procedural grounds. The layman on an emotional issue such as this does not have much patience with that. What I do have a problem with are those advocating that the executive branch take the law into its own hands, or folks on the street do. That is simply an outrageous position to advocate. What needs to be advocated is a new federal law that creates a much more difficult standard to kill by dehydration in my view.
Oh yes, thank you and you're welcome. I do my best, and try to do it objectively, and separate my personal views into a clear category of its own, from other commentary.