To: thoughtomator
So your few minutes of internet research should be considered before the opinion of a jurist who might, just might, have more data at his disposal and more working knowledge of Florida law.
Then we consider the appellate courts going up to the Supreme Court, which has already denied cert in this case once--and which it only takes four justices to grant review. If there was such malfeasance or incompetence, don't you think it's remotely possible that one of these venues may have been able to sniff it out as well as you and your keyboard?
29 posted on
03/23/2005 4:00:25 AM PST by
SeanEBoy
(Success?)
To: SeanEBoy
If there was such malfeasance or incompetence, don't you think it's remotely possible that one of these venues may have been able to sniff it outJudicial "collegiality" kills.
35 posted on
03/23/2005 4:05:25 AM PST by
syriacus
(Cranford says "Terri has no constitutional rights." Then why has she got a "right" to be starved?)
To: SeanEBoy
I spent more than just a few minutes at it, and I have found so many conflicts of interest and other dubious items that I can only imagine that the Schindlers' lawyers are incompetent. Remember, most courts considered only a very narrow slice of the case; only Greer had the entire case in his lap.
53 posted on
03/23/2005 4:21:37 AM PST by
thoughtomator
(Murder by Judges, 1 - 2 - 3, it's as easy to learn as your ABCBSCNNMSNBCs)
To: SeanEBoy
Oh yes there were also all sorts of gag orders and withholding of medical records that many of these courts didn't have access to the information that is public today.
56 posted on
03/23/2005 4:22:26 AM PST by
thoughtomator
(Murder by Judges, 1 - 2 - 3, it's as easy to learn as your ABCBSCNNMSNBCs)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson