Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeanEBoy
Oh so you come here attempting to impeach the credibility of doctors you know nothing about,asserting on the other hand the validity of the diagnosis of of other doctors whom you know nothing about,; all the while basing your argument on the correctness of the finding of the judge when the whole point of this affair and the congressional act is that Greer's finding of facts will not be considered and there should be a trial de novo.
25 posted on 03/23/2005 3:55:06 AM PST by northernlightsII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: northernlightsII

I'm not impeaching anything. The courts have considered the opinion of these doctors. See my next post.
Where did you obtain your law degree from?
Personal attacks are quite charming.


33 posted on 03/23/2005 4:03:35 AM PST by SeanEBoy (Success?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: northernlightsII
You know, there are experts that have ruled both ways. Who are any of us to say which group is correct? Are any of us experts? Have any of us examined her? Have any of us read the reams of reports and testimony? The answer to all those questions is no.

Rationalization is the second strongest human urge. Those who want her to live will pick the facts that align with our viewpoint. Those who want to let her go will cherry pick the facts that support their position.

51 posted on 03/23/2005 4:20:16 AM PST by Trust but Verify (Pull up a chair and watch history being made.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson