To: donh
I thought that I din't had to explain those details of the forgery, but since you raised the "other six skeletons" issue, I will:
1. a skeleton of someone who suffered of microcephaly was aged and buried into that cave.
2. Six other skeletons (normal) were buried also there, in different layers of earth. This is part of the deception base technique, SUGGESTION.
- This suggests to the average iditot that the other skeletons were also "hobbits".
- For the scientific spirits it was just announced that "they were dated in a range of 95,000 to 12,000 years old, dug up in different layers of earth". So it was clear that in case the question appeared: are the other six skeletons also "hobbits" the answer would be "no".
12 posted on
03/06/2005 1:59:21 PM PST by
Truth666
(http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
To: Truth666
Had you pursued blam's ref. with a little more vigor, you might have found this:
Falk and researchers from Washington University in St. Louis took three-dimensional CT scans of the interior of the Hobbit's skull. Known as virtual endocasts, these computer-manipulated images show the wrinkles, vessels and other surface features that made faint impressions on the skull's lining.
They compared that model with latex casts of the brains of chimps, a female Homo erectus, a contemporary woman, a pygmy and a European specimen of a person with a small-brain syndrome known as microcephaly.
14 posted on
03/06/2005 2:34:13 PM PST by
donh
To: Truth666
Six other skeletons (normal) were buried also there, in different layers of earth. This is part of the deception base technique, SUGGESTION. No, not NORMAL, Brown reported that ALL the remains his team found showed signs of diminutive stature.
17 posted on
03/06/2005 2:47:59 PM PST by
donh
To: Truth666
For the scientific spirits it was just announced that "they were dated in a range of 95,000 to 12,000 years old, dug up in different layers of earth". So it was clear that in case the question appeared: are the other six skeletons also "hobbits" the answer would be "no". So...what that demonstrates, since, in fact, they were ALL of diminutive stature, is that the diminuitive stature was not a temporal fluke.
Which makes you now, 0 for 3 in the guessing department. I recommend you take two aspirin, and try again in the morning when you are feeling less convinced that the entire world of science is consipiring against your God-given theories about the universe.
18 posted on
03/06/2005 2:52:25 PM PST by
donh
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson