To: Truth666
For the scientific spirits it was just announced that "they were dated in a range of 95,000 to 12,000 years old, dug up in different layers of earth". So it was clear that in case the question appeared: are the other six skeletons also "hobbits" the answer would be "no". So...what that demonstrates, since, in fact, they were ALL of diminutive stature, is that the diminuitive stature was not a temporal fluke.
Which makes you now, 0 for 3 in the guessing department. I recommend you take two aspirin, and try again in the morning when you are feeling less convinced that the entire world of science is consipiring against your God-given theories about the universe.
18 posted on
03/06/2005 2:52:25 PM PST by
donh
To: donh
The whole story is about the brain of one skeleton, the one that this brave professor examined.
There's no issue about the other six, it's an equatorial rain forest environment, where God placed the small people of the world (pygmy races).
Of course staging it with six other skeletons was just one part of the suggestion technique. The other was that they were pygmies.
This is the reason why the forgery was at that location - guess what the other candidate location to have placed the microcephaly patient's skull was...
20 posted on
03/06/2005 3:06:31 PM PST by
Truth666
(http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson