FWIW
To: martin_fierro
Looks kinda fake, but who knows?
One thing's for sure: If you are in one of those vehicles, you might as well say "just phuket" and forget it.
To: martin_fierro
To: martin_fierro
Looks fake. The big wave in the background looks to be around the same height as the ten-or-so story building that it's about to hit. The wave was around 20-30 ft. high as I recall
To: martin_fierro
This absolutely is 100% fake.
To: martin_fierro
6 posted on
02/02/2005 4:17:22 PM PST by
ScottFromSpokane
(http://drunkengop.blogspot.com/)
To: Constitution Day; Tijeras_Slim; annyokie; EggsAckley; Prime Choice; Registered
Pinging the FR Foto Fraud Finder Force.
7 posted on
02/02/2005 4:17:52 PM PST by
martin_fierro
(_____oooo_( ° ¿ ° )_oooo_____)
To: martin_fierro
"Surfs up Dude!"......... NOT
To: martin_fierro
I think I see "Tourist Guy" in that picture.
10 posted on
02/02/2005 4:20:05 PM PST by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: martin_fierro; Old Sarge
It's fake it got debunked a few weeks ago.
11 posted on
02/02/2005 4:20:25 PM PST by
annyokie
(If the shoe fits, put 'em both on!)
To: martin_fierro
We need someone that can read the data of the picture files. Someone on the GI Cody doll did this last night with that picture.
12 posted on
02/02/2005 4:20:42 PM PST by
stlnative
( LET G.I. JOE CODY GO NOW !)
To: martin_fierro
Definitely fake. Note that the big wave is higher than the hi-rise buildings. I saw this picture less than two weeks after the tsunami.
14 posted on
02/02/2005 4:21:54 PM PST by
6ppc
To: martin_fierro
Obvious fake. And I say that as an artist of 20+ years.
15 posted on
02/02/2005 4:25:56 PM PST by
atomicpossum
(I am the Cat that walks by himself, and all places are alike to me.)
To: martin_fierro
No that's real. I can see the guy surfing in like we heard about earlier.
16 posted on
02/02/2005 4:33:45 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
To: martin_fierro
At 200% zoom the pixelation in the wave is entirely wron - 100% fake
17 posted on
02/02/2005 4:36:09 PM PST by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
To: martin_fierro
For that wave to be as big as it is as compared to the buildings...it would be on the order of 200+ feet.
There was absolutely NO report anywhere of such a wave. The pic is a fake...and by using graphical analysis by zooming in to the pixel level, you can easily tell it...particularly where the water is coming up over the highway well in advance of the wave.
18 posted on
02/02/2005 5:22:19 PM PST by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: martin_fierro
If it's real, it's Bush's fault!
19 posted on
02/02/2005 5:57:28 PM PST by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: martin_fierro
"picture was forwarded by the head of the National Fire Sprinkler Association"
This is as fake as the ken doll hostage. The perspective of the wave would make it twenty stories tall. I also question whether there is a national fire sprinkler association, but if there is I imagine they have a lot of time on their hands.
To: martin_fierro
You can tell its fake by the mist overtaking the road, bad photoshop.
22 posted on
02/03/2005 2:19:02 PM PST by
Husker24
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson