French-Canadian FUD. Yawn.
If the operating system is inherently unsafe, there is no way that switching browsers can achieve more than a false sense of security.
While reading this, it occurred to me that this is a good analogy for Free Republic vs. Old Media.
Proponents of:-Dopen-source programmingaccurate news argue altruistic pursuit of perfection by legions of anonymousprogrammersFReepers is bound to producebetter codemore accurate news than aproprietary enginelying sack of dung such asMicrosoft'sDan RAthER.
Just as I thought.
The open source is 'secure" myth continues to crumble like. Al Gore's presidential ambitions!
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
SHADENFREUD!!
Firefox ping
I think I'll go with the 55.
I switched to Firefox and my web surfing has never been faster, the daily IE web page problems have disappeared, and so far my machine has far fewer things found by Ad Alert and Spybot when I do scans.
I'm no computer expert, but I don't think there is a browser that is impervious to hacking and probably never will be, so I will continue to use Mozilla just because I like it better than Internet Explorer.
Running even a straight Unix terminal and a text only browser would STILL leave you open to intrusion.
Give it a rest...
Firefox is still far better than IE6 ever hoped to be.
It's more secure than Internet Explorer AND... It doesn't download spyware/malware/adware.
So...
It may not be perfect, but it's better than IE.
There is no one operating system, browser, anti-virus, firewall, hardware router, or whatever, that cannot be exploited. Thousands of people are constantly looking for a way to hack everything.
The closest you can get to safety is to accept what I wrote above as gospel, keep your OS, browser, anti-virus and firewall updated and watch always for changes in your system.
If you don't understand what I just said, you are part of the problem.
Firefox: People who want no spyware and popups, plus faster surfing, wanted.
I don't care that it can be hacked.
Big deal. Anything can be hacked with the right tools.
This is news why?
It's not that Firefox is perfect. It's just that IE is less so.
"The United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT) does note that IE's design makes it very difficult to secure. They note that "There are a number of significant vulnerabilities in technologies relating to the IE domain/zone security model,-
-local file system (Local Machine Zone) trust, the Dynamic HTML (DHTML) document object model (in particular, proprietary DHTML features), the HTML Help system, MIME type determination, the graphical user interface (GUI), and ActiveX... IE is integrated into Windows to such an extent that vulnerabilities in IE frequently provide an attacker significant access to the operating system."
No one ever claimed Firefox was flawless. It's simply less flawed than Internet Explorer while being a better product.
It's cute how, since you think Firefox is for gullible morons, you then go on to use the browser with even more holes and exploit potential. A picket fence is better than an open yard.