Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I need help with marriage troubles (vanity)

Posted on 12/20/2004 6:41:03 AM PST by kerouacbal

I am 26 years old and have been married for 2 years. I am having trouble growing up and I am driving my wife nuts. It has gotten to the point that my wife talks about divorce almost every day. I want to work this out more then I every wanted anything but I can't seem to do it or do it quick enough. I can't seem to remember consistently to do every day things like take out the garbage make sure all the doors are locked and the heat is off at night (there is a lot more but won't get into it all). I am posting this here to try to get some advise on how to help my self grow up and start to take care of my wife and son better like a husband should. My parents are dead and I don't have a close family member or friend to get advise from. Could someone please help me.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 501-509 next last
To: justshutupandtakeit

"Stop getting too stoned."

Sorry. I see you wrote that he should stop getting too stoned, not stop getting stoned.

I can cop to that. Getting too stoned is not good, although it is pretty hard to get too stoned unless one has come across some really killer shit or one has eaten too many hash brownies.


381 posted on 12/20/2004 12:17:53 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: kerouacbal
Darlin',
There is some real good advice on these threads. Take it.

The rest makes me soooo glad I am single!

382 posted on 12/20/2004 12:18:05 PM PST by najida (Well lookee here! Cute shoes, chocolate and my own remote control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

"Marriage is for adults, my friend."

Yes, adults but not for slaves. He is already bringing home the bacon and you suggest he get busy in his spare time doing the laundry and washing the dishes.

Which leaves more time for his wife to bitc*, I suppose.


383 posted on 12/20/2004 12:22:03 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

....the baby diaper thing..its unforgivable,....

Yeah, the baby diaper thing. My first wife was so lazy that she decided it would be a good idea to put the huge plastic pail for the cotton diapers in the baby's room on the second floor. So she did and filled it with water with pails from the bathtub faucet, so she could flip the dirty diaper in it as needed. She didn't see that the pail got a hole in the bottom from all the water weight, so the dirty water slowly drained from the pail, through the oak floor.

When the ceiling came gushing down in sheets in the living room she noticed that there was a problem, but had to wait for me to get home seven hours later to start to clean up the mess.

Bitch!!


384 posted on 12/20/2004 12:22:27 PM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

:P


385 posted on 12/20/2004 12:22:39 PM PST by Laura Earl (1/2way290)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Are you admitting you're gay?

Yea, I'm a lesbian trapped in a mans body.
386 posted on 12/20/2004 12:23:43 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined
It is true that many well-adjusted people have been raised by one parent or in orphanages, and it is also true that many maladjusted people have been raised by both parents. This doesn't counter the argument that intact marriages are essential for children.

Proponents of the idea of marriage have always held that the institution exists primarily for the rearing of children. If the marriage ideal consists of a husband and wife raising children together, anything less is a degraded version of the ideal.

Unless adultery or abuse is occuring within the marriage, what needs to be considered is how an intact marriage affects the ultimate potentiality of the children reared within the family. If you say "plenty of good people have been raised in non-intact familes," I can ask "but how much better would these people be if their parents had remained together?" And if you say "plenty of stinkers have been raised in intact families," I can ask "but how much worse would these people have been had their parents' marriages ended in divorce?"

I suppose, if your notion of "essentiality" merely encompasses "that which might lead to a positive result," the notion of intact families is neither here nor there. But if the idea of the essentiality of intact marriages encompasses what is best (and not merely adequate, or merely better than some other arrangement) for the child within any traditional standard, intact marriages are essential for children. One need look no further than the inner city of your nearest metropolis for proof.

387 posted on 12/20/2004 12:23:49 PM PST by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: King Black Robe

I would agree with this if we were talking about a business partnership instead of a marriage. If you start at the notion that you want to avoid a divorce at all costs for religious reasons, then my post makes more sense. I know that the prevailing response is that she will just walk all over him and take advantage of him, but if he really wants to fix his marriage and make up for mistakes that he has made, making himself this vulnerable will help to convince her that he is truly committed to the relationship, which will in turn, hopefully make her more willing to work at saving the marriage. If he adopts the quid pro quo approach that you implicity suggest, she will probably file for divorce.


388 posted on 12/20/2004 12:24:22 PM PST by Deo et Patria (Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Laura Earl
You haven't trained him to lose the butts though.
389 posted on 12/20/2004 12:25:55 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

Is there a point to your derision?


390 posted on 12/20/2004 12:28:55 PM PST by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: kerouacbal

Move to a blue state, they need people like you to help them with the next vote.


391 posted on 12/20/2004 12:29:07 PM PST by way2cool01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

This thread is a moron magnet.


392 posted on 12/20/2004 12:29:52 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
"So you want this man, who forced his sick wife to go out in the snow and take out the baby's dirty diapers rather than to get off his ass and do it himself, to go commit adultery to fix things."

Where did the snow come from? I suppose she had to get up off her death bed hauling the garbage miles and miles from the garage to the curb through snow drifts six feet deep with the wind howling at eighty miles per hour, because if she didn't do it, the garage would be a little stinky and she spends so much time out in the garage.
393 posted on 12/20/2004 12:31:03 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

Max, you're right on. I don't think that Chunga has a full grasp of the seriesness of this here situation!


394 posted on 12/20/2004 12:31:59 PM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Thanks. I was confused.


395 posted on 12/20/2004 12:34:01 PM PST by Rebelbase (Who is General Chat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

I think this thread is theraputic for some people!


396 posted on 12/20/2004 12:35:17 PM PST by Rebelbase (Who is General Chat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

I got so pissed it forced me I decided to look for some strange.


397 posted on 12/20/2004 12:35:35 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
"the baby diaper thing..its unforgivable."

It has been a long time, but those diapers sure do stink, don't they.
398 posted on 12/20/2004 12:37:29 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

It all depends on if he has a well-developed "wife ear" or not.


399 posted on 12/20/2004 12:39:12 PM PST by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

Wow...you posted a real pic, not one of the fake ones!


400 posted on 12/20/2004 12:39:36 PM PST by Laura Earl (1/2way290)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 501-509 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson