Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Life on Planet Charles [Prince Charles, idiot to the manor born, sneers at the little people]
November 21, 2004 | Cole Moreton (U.K.)

Posted on 11/23/2004 2:41:42 AM PST by snarks_when_bored

Life on Planet Charles

Toothpaste squeezed by a flunky. Supper steamed with one brand of water. Oh, and an £11m income. This is the man who presses a world view on us all - and whose latest embarrassment, of many, reveals that he condemned an underling for daring to seek promotion. Cole Moreton reports

21 November 2004

In the past 10 days the Prince of Wales has: met a wooden puppet of the Goddess of Love and the lesbian pop duo Tatu; told a gala dinner at the Ritz that mutton must be restored to its "rightful place" in the British menu; played a wrist-drum at a breast cancer clinic in Kent; praised alternative therapies again; laid a wreath at the Cenotaph; given a speech on "local identity in a fast-track age"; and entertained the Chiracs. His qualifications for doing all this? Low-grade A-levels in French and History and a second-class degree from Cambridge. Oh, and his name. Charles Windsor believes that pronouncing to his future subjects on everything from nannying to nanotechnology (although he failed his maths O-level) is his duty by birth. It is what he was born to do. And now we finally know what we long suspected: that he believes the rest of us were born to stay in our places.

"What is wrong with people nowadays?" wrote the Prince in a note to an aide that became public last week when it was used as evidence in an industrial tribunal. "Why do they all seem to think they are qualified to do things far beyond their technical capabilities?" Those were private thoughts. He wasn't worrying about his public image. He certainly wasn't writing a speech fit for a patron of a charity that helps the disadvantaged.

"This is all to do with the learning culture in schools," he wrote of people with ideas above their station. "It is a consequence of the child-centred system which admits no failure and tells people they can all be pop stars, High Court judges, brilliant TV presenters or even infinitely more competent heads of state without ever putting in the necessary effort or having abilities. It's social utopianism which believes humanity can be genetically and socially re-engineered to contradict the lessons of history."

Those words are profoundly lacking in self-awareness, but there is a decent point in there somewhere: our culture does encourages us all to believe we are a lottery ticket, an audition or a reality show away from fame and fortune. That is dangerous. But do we really need to be told to limit our aspirations by somebody whose palaces and country homes are beyond the dreams of even lottery winners? The note was written in response to a query from Elaine Day, a personal assistant at Clarence House, as to whether PAs with university degrees might be allowed to train to become royal private secretaries. A modest ambition, hardly Pop Idol.

If the day on which he wrote his reply was typical, Prince Charles rose no earlier than nine. He sleeps in the nude and steps into a Turnbull & Asser robe with his own crest embroidered on the chest. He cleans his teeth using toothpaste squeezed by a royal aide using a crested gold clip. He typically walks through to his dressing room where a Savile Row suit and tailored shirt are draped over chairs (he leaves his clothes abandoned on the floor at the end of every day for the staff to pick up and launder) and steps into handmade shoes that cost £650 a pair. Later he sits at a desk, the royal posterior comfortable on the plumped up cushion that is carried around for him to use wherever he goes.

Elaine Day wrote to the Prince hoping he might reform the "Edwardian" behaviour of his staff in a household that was "all about status and hierarchy". In March 2003 he wrote a note to her boss, Paul Kefford, which was read out on Wednesday when Ms Day appeared at a tribunal in Croydon claiming sex discrimination and unfair dismissal.

Prince Charles and his staff have tried very hard to keep their intimate affairs private. An inquiry into the conduct of the royal household last year was carried out by Sir Michael Peat, the head of that same household. He found, to nobody's surprise, that nothing was seriously wrong - except that a member of staff who accused another of rape had been threatened with character assassination then paid off. And official gifts to the Prince had been given as perks to staff or sold. The Prince's personal adviser, Michael Fawcett, resigned - but was soon back with a six-figure contract to run special events. Last year, Sir Michael Peat took the extraordinary step of issuing a public denial of a rumour of royal sexual behaviour that nobody in this country could legally talk about in public.

An obsession with hierarchy and detail was exposed when Elaine Day told the tribunal she had been disciplined for failing to remove the name of a guest from one of the meals and drinks parties to which the Prince of Wales likes to invite experts. This one was on education and included Chris Woodhead, the former chief inspector of schools. It is not thought to have included Charles Clarke, Secretary of State for Education, who laid into the Prince for the words of the leaked memo on Thursday: "To be frank, I think he is very old-fashioned and out of time, and he doesn't understand what is going on in the British education system at the moment."

The Prince, for his part, likes to spend most of the time listening when he rounds up his little brains trusts. Architects, environmentalists or others walk around the organic vegetable garden at Highgrove, of which the Prince is so proud, or take drinks in one of the rooms at Clarence House renovated with £4.5m of taxpayers' money, before lunch or supper. The Prince need not take notes. There is someone to do that for him. One former adviser said his speeches "resemble no more than a good sixth-form essay", although cancer experts thought that a generous verdict when the Prince lectured them in June about the benefits of the Gerson Therapy, which uses coffee enemas and has been branded dangerous. "Charles is abusing his position to put around wacky ideas which have no scientific credence," said one specialist.

We all know the royal family thinks the world smells of fresh paint, but the credibility gap between the Prince's supper-club view of the world and reality becomes a serious problem when he starts to lecture us on the nature of reality. The Prince who empathises with an old lady at a drop-in centre about the price of getting around these days probably arrived in a limousine. He takes nothing from the Civil List but is entitled to the profits of the Duchy of Cornwall, which were £11.9m last year, putting him among the top 100 earners in the country. If the old lady offers him a piece of cake he probably won't take it: Charles tries to stick to food cooked by his own staff to strict instructions - his vegetables, for example, may only be steamed using a particular brand of mineral water.

His eldest son is also wrestling with the reality gap. William talked on Friday of the joy of being able to walk into a supermarket near his university and buy asparagus like a normal person, but he didn't mention his bodyguards; he talked of a desire to lead men into battle knowing it would be unthinkable for a future king to do so.

The Windsors have long wanted us to believe they are both ordinary and special. That is a difficult tightrope to walk - and the Prince of Wales falls off it, spectacularly, when he complains so bitterly about secretaries who just want to get slightly better jobs. Unfortunately, life on Planet Charles does not qualify him to see that.



TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: borntobedumb; hypocrite; manoredidiot; mirrorless; princecharles
The rest of this article may be found here.

Charles, a man of exceedingly modest ability but fantastically fortunate birth, presumes to lecture those less favored by birth (but almost certainly more favored by ability) on their silly aspirations and foolish hopes for self-improvement.

Here's a man who's had every advantage dropped into his lap throughout his life, but who apparently has never, ever looked into a mirror and asked himself who he really is and how he came to be one of the luckiest (but perhaps least deserving) blokes of all time.

1 posted on 11/23/2004 2:41:43 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

And the Brits wonder why we broke from their rule?


2 posted on 11/23/2004 3:59:47 AM PST by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Too much inbreeding going on across The Pond.


3 posted on 11/23/2004 5:05:06 AM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

4 posted on 11/23/2004 7:50:55 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

5 posted on 11/23/2004 7:52:29 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Ugh...looks like that's not the first one he'd hoisted that day.


6 posted on 11/23/2004 8:21:13 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

I think it's Photoshopped.


7 posted on 11/23/2004 9:39:03 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Uh-huh. That's the fun of it.


8 posted on 11/23/2004 9:40:21 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
What? Me worry?

9 posted on 11/23/2004 10:04:29 AM PST by Brainhose (THINK OF THE KITTENS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

..as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honors that we are fighting, but for freedom -- for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself
Declaration of Arbroath April 6, 1320


10 posted on 11/23/2004 10:11:27 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

I saw a ceremony on CSPAN last night that featured the Queen in here crown reading some prepared speech that stated the obvious. It was just embarassing to see all the fuss over this woman that does basically nothing.

The Brits should send the Windsors packing. They serve no function. I don't know why Brits. aren't furious that their nation spends millions to feed and house these deadbeats. Aren't there any Brits. on this website that could see about getting them bounced.


11 posted on 11/23/2004 10:28:10 AM PST by orangelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: orangelobster

I'm thinking that for the bobbies to pry Charles and the rest of that crew out of their palaces would be like the cops trying to drag Jerry Lundegaard out of his motel room at the end of "Fargo".


12 posted on 11/23/2004 12:14:57 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brainhose
Yep, Charles looks like Alfred E., and probably laughs like Goofy.
13 posted on 11/23/2004 12:37:07 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

"and the lesbian pop duo Tatu;"

Hasn't TATU been outed as actually being straight?


14 posted on 11/23/2004 3:05:05 PM PST by Starter ("Santa's tendrils reach far and wide...there is no hiding from the Claus organization.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Sounds like just another dysfunctional family with no concept of reality.

WHO was the Prince who married a divorced commoner? Can someone name the guy? It's bugging me.


15 posted on 02/10/2005 3:39:04 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh
WHO was the Prince who married a divorced commoner? Can someone name the guy? It's bugging me.

You didn't specify a time frame. Could you be thinking of the famous King Edward/Wallis Simpson romance? Here you go:

"King Edward VIII did something that monarchs do not have the luxury of doing - he fell in love. King Edward was in love with Mrs. Wallis Simpson, not only an American, but also a married woman already once divorced. Yet, in order to marry the woman he loved, King Edward was willing to give up the British throne - and he did."

16 posted on 02/10/2005 3:55:53 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson