To: Iowa Granny; Neets; Molly Pitcher; Miss Marple; Dog; Dr. Scarpetta; lysie; Jemian; bevlar
Well, you know what's funny to me???
What is funny is that we will reject a Black Woman With Two Ph.D.'s because she happens to be pro-choice. However, we are expected to roll over an die for a Senator from Pennsyvania who votes 70% of the time with the Dems, and who lied his ass off to both vanquish his primary opponent AND his general election opponent.(I say roll over and die, because President Bush came to town in PA and shut down the campaign of the REAL Republican in PA, Pa Toomey.) AND, upon securing his latest reelection, the incumbent announces in no uncertain terms that he is not on the same wavelength with the President vis-a-vis federal judges, and that one of the things most dear to his 'base' -- that of the pro-life agenda -- is for all purposes dead when he becomes the Judiciary Commiittee Chairman.
Now, I thought that Orrin Hatch was about as bad as we could do in an appeaser-Republican. but now, we have the Philadelphia Inquirer rep on the Committee.
What are we going to do about Arlen Spector? And how do we get him to respect the mandate that constitutes the results of Election 2004????
To: Bitwhacker
We don't accept Arlen Specter. He is very repulsive and if there were a national election, he would be going down the road with Little Tommy.
Why in the world do y'all keep re-electing him?
185 posted on
11/05/2004 7:38:41 PM PST by
Jemian
(Saving the Republic, one vote at a time.)
To: Bitwhacker
I'm not sure there is anything "we" can do about him. I share your frustration with him.
He is obviously NOT a man of honor.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson