Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ramius
That makes absolutely no sense, unless the law is deliberately structured to ensure failure to comply. Which is not impossible!
2,589 posted on 10/15/2004 9:56:43 PM PDT by Bear_in_RoseBear (The difference between a geek and a nerd is someone who eats more paste than you do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2584 | View Replies ]


To: Bear_in_RoseBear

In the initial meet-n-greet meeting with the (major accounting firm) auditors, they told us that nomatter the quality of what we present them, they *will* call out deficiences that must be presented to the Board of Directors.

They said that if they present no deficiences, then this would be evidence that they didn't look closely enough, since it is assumed under the law (I $#!t you not) that no organization can actually comply with Sarb-Ox without lying about it.

I am not kidding.


2,594 posted on 10/15/2004 10:05:16 PM PDT by Ramius (Time? What time do you think we have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2589 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson